Gee, Boris, I never realized how rude and condescending you were. You call him names, why? Because he shares a similar interest, but a dissimilar view. I enjoyed Southhacks rambling much more than your technical obfuscation. Anger in technical argument often demonstrates weakness of position.
Ask Physicist or RadioAstronomer if my responses were "technical obfuscation" or perhaps concise descriptions of why modern physics disdains his 19-th century notions.
If you find them "obfuscation" I suggest you should read up on physics yourself.
--Boris
I agree with that.
Southack did NOTHING to deserve the condescending "you are an ignoramus" attitude.
and there are quite a few folks rethinking the lightspeed conundrum of late.
string theory posits a lot of very interesting "instantaenous" things happening billions of light years apart.
and with the fall of the speed of light "absolute" of late... the traditional borders are falling too...
back before automobiles, people posited that going faster than a few hundred miles an hour would kill a human being.
they had physics to back it up too.
they also believed the earth was flat and the center of the universe.
it pays to keep an open mind.