True but irrelevant. Logan's culpability is not the issue here.
2) Criminals are now using the police non-pursuit regulations to commit more crimes and drive away faster and eventually kill more people.
Prove it. And even if so, the police are morally responsible for their actions, including when they incite accidents.
3) Beck had already been shot.
So, if I've been shot, I can shoot you with impunity?
4) There is no evidence to prove that the perp attempted the carjacking solely because of Beck.
Given the evidence in the record, it's the most likely interpretation. It's not necessary to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, since the standard in a civil case is simply preponderance of the evidence.
5) some situations just plain suck, you will be victimized, and you can't cash in on them.
Yes, that's true--as Beck can certainly tell you from personal experience.
"Beck is partially responsible for Logan's apparent attempt to carjack Denmark's van, because he was forcing Logan to run for his life"
Connor Peterson is partially responsible for Scott Peterson killing his wife, Laci, because he was forcing Scott to deal with his phobia of family. (Note: If Scott
Peterson is innocent, disregard)
Better yet: I as an American am responsible for the human garbage that killed thousands on September 11, because I voted for the president that perpetuated the cruel policy of oppressing terrorists.
Nobody has any personal responsibility anymore. It's so obvious the freaking armed robber should be held criminally and civilly liable for Ms. Denmark's injuries and pain. And if the stupid law books don't say that, they should be re-written by people who haven't spent years immersed in liberal entitlements.