1 posted on
07/23/2004 6:57:00 PM PDT by
TYVets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last
To: TYVets
right of a business to regulate its own property is more important
I wonder if a business owner would have the same right if faced with a city ordinance banning smoking in bars
250 posted on
07/25/2004 7:57:46 AM PDT by
Hot Tabasco
(After 30+ years dealing with idiots, I still haven't earned the right to just shoot them.....)
To: TYVets
Misleading headline. Owning a gun is not the reason; bringing it onto company property is.
266 posted on
07/27/2004 3:06:56 PM PDT by
JimRed
(Fight election fraud! Volunteer as a local poll watcher, challenger or district official.)
To: First_Salute
The court says mere citizens may not go armed in certain places, but the president and legislature have exempted law enforcement officers and former LEOs.
So we are witnessing the federalization of property rights as well.
268 posted on
07/29/2004 4:11:33 AM PDT by
snopercod
(Quatro por las quatro con la Quatro)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson