1 posted on
07/23/2004 6:57:00 PM PDT by
TYVets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: TYVets
What do you expect from RINO orin hatch state??
A pile of garbage!
2 posted on
07/23/2004 6:59:02 PM PDT by
steplock
( www.spadata.com)
To: TYVets
3 posted on
07/23/2004 7:00:45 PM PDT by
traumer
To: TYVets
Well I certainly agree that property owners have a right to decide what they allow on their property. No reason the employees can't leave the weapon at home. This is not stopping anyone from hunting after work.
To: TYVets
The parking lot is the employer's property but isn't the locked trunk the car owner's property? How does my right to have whatever I have in the locked trunk of my car changed simply due to where I have chosen to drive?
5 posted on
07/23/2004 7:02:44 PM PDT by
Tall_Texan
(Ronald Reagan - Greatest President of the 20th Century.)
To: TYVets
This pits the rights of employees to exercise their constitutional rights against employers who ought to be able to fire employees for any reason or no reason at all.
I have to come down on the side of the employers here, even if I disagree with their policy. The Bill of Rights protects you against the government, not other private citizens, including businesses.
7 posted on
07/23/2004 7:04:36 PM PDT by
Dog Gone
To: TYVets
I have no problem with this decision. AOL can regulate its workplace as it sees fit.
I also have no problem refusing to buy anything from AOL-Time Warner because of their stupid anti-gun policy.
To: TYVets
I'm big on private property and guns. But I think its clear that the property owner controls here. Nobody forced them to work for AOL.
9 posted on
07/23/2004 7:05:08 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: TYVets
But I would sure like to know how the hell the company knew they had weapons in the trunk.
10 posted on
07/23/2004 7:06:11 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: TYVets
The court decision is correct. AOL has the right to control what comes onto their property.
Choosing to exercise their God-given right to prohibit guns simply confirms that they are a desperately evil organization.
14 posted on
07/23/2004 7:09:42 PM PDT by
Sloth
(We have to support RINOs like Specter; their states are too liberal to elect someone like Santorum.)
To: TYVets
IF YOU ARE VIEWING THIS POST VIA AOL, PLEASE TERMINATE YOUR ACCOUNT IMMEDIATELY. OUTDOORS UNLIMITED IS THE OFFICIAL ISP OF THE NRA.
http://www.outdoorsunlimited.netAnd yes, I was shouting.
15 posted on
07/23/2004 7:10:20 PM PDT by
NonValueAdded
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" HRC 6/28/2004)
To: TYVets
In a decision that diminishes rights guaranteed under both the Utah and the U.S. Constitution, the court acknowledged the individual right to keep and bear arms, but said the right of a business to regulate its own property is more important! So, I wonder if this right extends to business owners whether to allow smoking on their property?...JFK
17 posted on
07/23/2004 7:12:24 PM PDT by
BADROTOFINGER
(Life sucks. Get a helmet.)
To: TYVets
This is beyond belief. Over the top. Un-freekin-believable. AOL just made a huge mistake. Number one, who gives a rip if someone has a weapon in the locked trunk of their car? Second, for AOL to make a "federal case" out of this is bad business. That company hasn't a clue in attracting customers in the first place except for kids who want to 'chat' and go to porno sites. I hate AOL. The ONLY reson I use them is that I travel a LOT and they do have a lot of local dial-ups which I need when working from my hotel. That's it.
20 posted on
07/23/2004 7:14:40 PM PDT by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: TYVets
Property rights trumps Constitutional rights? Another court gone mad.
27 posted on
07/23/2004 7:18:43 PM PDT by
highlander_UW
(Evil doesn't want to leave you alone. It wants to draw you in and force you into complicity. - Keyes)
To: TYVets
A little biased headline...
AOL can fire employees that bring their firearms onto AOLs property.
As it has always been.. ones 2nd ammendment rights don't trump private property owners rights to say no guns here.
28 posted on
07/23/2004 7:20:45 PM PDT by
HamiltonJay
("You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.")
To: TYVets
The "solution" is just to park your car off AOL property. Just a thought.
32 posted on
07/23/2004 7:22:18 PM PDT by
Torie
To: TYVets
Self-defense took a big blow.False and hypberbolic. Do we expect this from NRA?
48 posted on
07/23/2004 7:33:14 PM PDT by
Tax Government
(Dumb-shi-crats -- just what our country needs. Not.)
To: TYVets
C'mon. The title isn't even correct.
50 posted on
07/23/2004 7:36:44 PM PDT by
Half Vast Conspiracy
(If the Rapture is coming, should I insist on a non-Christian pilot?)
To: All
Attention all potential criminals. If your looking to rob or rape anyone wait outside a AOL parking lot and follow your victim when they leave our parking lot. When they stop, do what you will with your victim. And next time your looking for a internet provider remember who disarmed your victims for you.
52 posted on
07/23/2004 7:37:07 PM PDT by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's floats, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: TYVets
Does this also mean they also own your car once it hits their property? Or they have a right to search your car for what ever reason they trump up? Screw AOL. They will never get my business.
61 posted on
07/23/2004 7:43:18 PM PDT by
BriarBey
To: .38sw
Here's one that'll p**s you off.
91 posted on
07/23/2004 8:12:44 PM PDT by
sweetliberty
("A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left." (Eccl. 10:2))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson