Posted on 07/23/2004 3:32:50 PM PDT by sinkspur
While her previous sexual history will not be admitted, the judge has just ruled that any post-KB-sexual activity WILL be admitted.
An idiot might be a person who claims that "If I was [sic] raping a woman and got her blood on my shirt I would stop."
Rapists do not stop when told "No." Furthermore, unless you walk around with a CSI lab, you cannot tell whether you have minuscule blood dots in your shirt.
Most posters on FreeRepublic would consider Bryant's behavior that night a lapse of judgment
It was a lapse of judgment, both in Bryant's case and in K.F.'s case.
Nevertheless, Bryant is not being accused in court of being a "very stupid person."
Bryant is being accused in court of being a rapist, and that was the issue I was addressing with quotes from the court record.
No! I represent what is right about our justice system. I am a conservative, and even if the prosecutor is a pub, he is wrong if he does not toss this case. You should read all the facts before formulating an opinion in this case, you do not seem to have them in hand. I have read the facts and I have my opinion, lets see who is right.
Kobie will walk, that means he has money not that he did not rape this woman. It also means that you are smart enough to defend a spoiled athelete who can get away with anything and I am too stupid to see that money can buy anything. OJ was right too I guess.
I am usually not a name caller, but because your posts have no merit or logical basis, I am forced to call you an idiot.
Have you ever been to court? I have and the last thing you will find there is justice. You can pretend to be so very smart but unless you have walked the walk then you are not as smart as you think you are.
Thank you, you have proved my point. I forced you to call me an idiot because you did not agree with me. Kobie was forced to rape this woman because she would not submit to him either, it is the same thing. I am an idiot because you are right and Kobie was right. Guess that is all we need to know.
I miss the death before dishonor days.
If I read all the facts that have been prionted in the case I will have the answer, right? The case has not even gone to trial and you know the truth? You need to call them and let thm know right away. And I am the idiot?
Maybe she was having sex with the investigators to show them how it happened.
Sure it is!
This lil hussy is finding out that f-ing celebs then bragging about it, then having more sex with b/f(s)... THEN crying rape does not bode well for her credibility.
I hope when Kobe's cleared, he sues her for defamation of character.
It's obvious by your emotional response that you believe to have been the victim of some injustice. Somehow you are linking your perceived injustice with the Bryant's case.
All I can tell you is that I started following Bryant's case as a believer in his guilt. It was only after I took a couple of hours to read the court transcripts posted at The Smoking Gun, that I realized Bryant's guilt is far from certain. So far, the DA has not presented any solid evidence of Bryant's guilt, IMHO.
As far as OJ, I thought he was guilty as sin.
After reading all the posts, I am not the only one who has called you an idiot. I like the company I'm in.!!
You are convinced, have all the answers, and the case has not started. OK I guess we are both really stupid.
Looks like she wanted to party with celebrities and got into more than she could handle.
You've left the door open for a LOT Of speculation as to just why YOU were in the courtroom.
In fact, we could probably start a whole thread.
You are convinced, have all the answers, and the case has not started. OK I guess we are both really stupid.
Read my statement again, posted in gray at the top.
I'm not convinced of anything. All I said is:
So far, the DA has not presented any solid evidence of Bryant's guilt, IMHO.If culpatory evidence is presented during the trial, I would change my mind pronto.
>>Do rape victims have sex within 24 hours after the rape, especially if the so-called rape involved "injuries"?<<
No. If this info is true, this whole case has become a joke.
Fact is, it really IS hard for a slut to be part of a successful rape prosecution, which is what the defense always likes to suggest/prove/demonstrate.
And a single woman having consensual sex shortly after being "raped" is most definitely a slut. For such a woman, being raped is the equivalent of Michael Moore being forced to eat another donut. Not nice, but not serious either.
I believe those are the "outcry witnesses" referred to in the ruling.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.