Wow, did Cashill have Gorelick pegged or what. The article was written in April 03. I wonder what they said or did to Kallstrom to get him to back down. Does anyone have any theories on that? Very interesting all of this. I haven't read Cashill's book. What is his conclusion? Bomb? Missile? Terrorist? Military?
241-"Wow, did Cashill have Gorelick pegged or what. The article was written in April 03."
Exactly - look at this article by Cashill back in 2003. Here is a short excerpt:
---
FAA special agent blows whistle on FBI-TWA Flight 800
Posted: August 29, 2003
As we have reported earlier, FBI honcho Jim Kallstrom was called to Washington on Aug. 22 for a come-to-Jesus meeting chaired by Deputy Attorney General, Jamie Gorelick, now conveniently one of only five Democrats on the high-level 9-11 commission. All behavior changed after this day, just three days before the Democratic Convention. Despite overwhelming evidence of a missile strike, the FBI was no longer allowed to search for the truth. Its new mission was to find a plausible scenario other than a bomb or a missile strike.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34332 lots of other good info in this story