You'd barely know about it if left to the so-called "not liberal" media.
This story has been given the order from above to be buried. Only Republican scandals may be reported on.
Big stories like the "AWOL" scandal redux. Isn't that amazing btw? Nothing new happened in the last four years since the last election to make it relevent other than the DNC wanted to talk about it again and the media MADE it a story. Sort of how Michael Moore's throughly debunked factless movie got all that free publicity by a willing media.
But something bad about former Kerry advisor Berger that could embarass? Sandy who? Parody him? Why, that would be mean, why would we do that?
Makes me sick.
This story has been given the order from above to be buried. Only Republican scandals may be reported on.,,, Makes me sick.
What evidence do you base your statements on?
Even a basic search shows plenty of coverage, although not all of it is from an unbiased point of view.
Big stories like the "AWOL" scandal redux. Isn't that amazing btw? Nothing new happened in the last four years since the last election to make it relevent other than the DNC wanted to talk about it again and the media MADE it a story.
Wouldn't you love to see the big alphabetters like Rather seated in the interviewee chair and asked, "How do you justify keeping the 30-year-old military service records of President Bush as a story in the news for months while not reporting on Clinton's National Security advisor allegedly stealing/tampering with top secret documents from the National Archives during a time of risk of terrorism on our soil and while he is appointed the top national security advisor to the Democratic presidential presumptive nominee?"
If only life were like that.