Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If fat is an illness, can ugly be far behind?
WorldNetDaily ^ | 7/22/04 | Jane Chastain

Posted on 07/22/2004 6:33:11 PM PDT by wagglebee

If you have been unhappy with the length or your nose, the width of your lips, the shape of your ears, the droop of your eyebrows or the sag of your chin – anything the modern beauty police deem to be unattractive – soon, help may be on the way in the form of a check from Uncle Sam or your insurance company.

With fat now a national health concern, can ugly be far behind?

Last week, with a stroke of a government erasure, Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson removed language in Medicare's coverage manual that states that obesity is not an illness.

If obesity, in government-speak, no longer is "not an illness," one can assume it is an illness, and, if it is an illness, it must be covered by Medicare. The change means that Medicare and Medicaid participants may begin asking for reimbursement for treating excess weight and these requests will be considered.

The implication is HUGE!

If you have been longing to join a health club or one of those fad diet groups, but found them to be a little pricey for your budget, just hold on to your love handles folks – the government will foot the bill. It's only a matter of time.

It doesn't mean your weight-loss program of choice automatically will be covered or that drastic stomach reduction surgery your doctor has proposed, but the nose of the camel – or in this case the elephant – is under this tent.

The fat patrol is circling. Atkins Nutritionals, Slim-Fast Foods, Jenny Craig and Weight Watchers are just a few of the companies salivating over the possibility of sinking their teeth into this new pocket of government largess.

This step by HHS allows "members of the public" to request that Medicare review medical evidence to determine which interventions improve health outcomes for seniors, disabled and poor Americans who are obese.

In practical terms, it means those with the loudest voices and the biggest purses will be heard. One of the loudest voices in this debate is the American Obesity Association, which is a mouthpiece for those in the pharmaceutical and weight-loss industry.

Because private insurance companies often pattern their coverage after Medicare, the decision is expected to put strong pressure on the private sector to begin coverage for weight-loss treatments.

Presently, 64 percent of Americans are deemed to be overweight. Rarely in the annals of government has an administration ceased the opportunity to pander to so many at one time!

The government has absolved you of any guilt for those excess pounds you have acquired. It's not your fault that you are overweight, that you spend too much time at the table or in front of the television instead of the tennis court or the treadmill. You are ill! It is no longer your problem. It is society's problem.

If we are to believe Tommy Thompson, it is in the government's best interest to treat this problem. First, the administration fixed Medicare – a program that is going broke – by adding an expensive new drug benefit. Now it wants us to begin covering the costs related to this new war on fat.

Thompson has thrown out a lot of big numbers in an effort to prove his battle of the bulge is cost effective. According to Thompson, obesity-related illnesses are costing us $117 billion and 300,000 lives per year.

Those figures are bunk! The only way you can come up with 300,000 figure is to assume that every overweight person who dies, dies as a result of those extra pounds, even if they drown or are killed in a car crash.

As to the $117 billion we supposedly shell out for treating obesity related diseases each year, that figure first appeared in 1998 in Obesity Research, a publication of the North American Association for the Study of Obesity, which is funded by – you guessed it – pharmaceutical companies. Nevertheless, this industry urban legend has found its way into government publications and now is taken as fact.

If fat is now an illness, why not ugly?

Researchers would have little trouble finding individuals who do not measure up to the standards set by the nation's beauty police who have been depressed and taken their own lives. Also, depression is known to be a contributing factor to any number of diseases.

Just think of all the plastic surgeons and cosmetic companies that could benefit from this pronouncement!

Now that the fat police have tapped into the public treasury, can the beauty police be far behind?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: illnesses; lawsuits; medicaid; obesity; ugliness
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
I still don't understand which article of the Constitution makes it the governments responsibility to deal with any of this.
1 posted on 07/22/2004 6:33:12 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I guess I'm sick as a dog then.


2 posted on 07/22/2004 6:34:55 PM PDT by bad company ((<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">Hatriotism))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

micheal moore is a very sick man


3 posted on 07/22/2004 6:37:24 PM PDT by goldwaterlives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I believe that government freebies and benefits should be extended to the healthy.

After all, it is very stressful being healthy and having the pressure to pull the weight of all those misfits out there.

It's time that us healthy working stiffs get some relief.

4 posted on 07/22/2004 6:38:45 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (I never had the makings of a varsity athlete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

If this pans out, my sisters in law have a two-fer.


5 posted on 07/22/2004 6:41:08 PM PDT by annyokie (Now with 20% More Infidel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I still don't understand which article of the Constitution makes it the governments responsibility to deal with any of this.

I'm guessing the commerce clause under the interpretation that was used to say what the 2nd amendment really means is the right to a vegetarian sandwhich.

6 posted on 07/22/2004 6:41:25 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

"If fat is now an illness, why not ugly?"

Nope.Way too many of the folks that think this way are.


7 posted on 07/22/2004 6:44:35 PM PDT by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M

All they have to do is DECLARE WAR on fat, and I'm in trouble!


8 posted on 07/22/2004 6:46:17 PM PDT by bannie (Liberal Me<img src="dia: The Most Dangerous Enemies to America and Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
If this pans out, my sisters in law have a two-fer.

LMAO!

9 posted on 07/22/2004 6:47:06 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
If you have been longing to join a health club or one of those fad diet groups, but found them to be a little pricey for your budget, just hold on to your love handles folks – the government will foot the bill. It's only a matter of time.

Of course this is all for those who are dependent on the government for their health care. Since the same government doles out food stamps to them --- would those now be seen as causing disease and stopped? The government should not be feeding the poor because it's giving them a disease.

10 posted on 07/22/2004 6:55:08 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Oh, put 'em all on Atkins. Buying all those steaks would be a bargain.


11 posted on 07/22/2004 6:58:41 PM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone

They should limit food stamps to only a few foods that have no sugar and fat ---- rice and beans would be affordable and would not get them so obese. The fattest people you see are usually on Medicaid and food stamps and do nothing but sit in front of television all day -- so it's fine with me if the government starts seeing it as a disease and stops over-feeding them.


12 posted on 07/22/2004 7:01:45 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
If that's the case then Hillery is nixed, and those ugly bitches like Molly Yard, and the monkey women of the left (no deodorant, no hair combing, no shaving) they get dumped. Look at the left, NO CLASS ,and no deodorant!
13 posted on 07/22/2004 7:06:06 PM PDT by timydnuc ("Give me Liberty, or give me death"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FITZ

Beans are fine, but rice is bad. I would say anything that's on South Beach phase 2 would be a good compromise.


14 posted on 07/22/2004 7:09:32 PM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
If we are to believe Tommy Thompson...

I wouldn't believe anybody named "Tommy Thompson" and I don't care who he works for.

As far as the rest of this goes...

I have updated my FMCDH sign-off with the addition of (BITS).....Blood In The Streets, which I foresee coming soon, due to the enormous increase of the communist progressive movement being shoved down the throat of this failing REPUBLIC through the Judicial tyranny of fiat law, and the passing of unconstitutional laws by the Legislative and Executive branches of our government.....guess I need to add "programs" "directives" uh...any other name the bastards put on spending our money on things not garaunteed by OUR Constitution... FMCDH(BITS)

15 posted on 07/22/2004 7:18:26 PM PDT by nothingnew (KERRY: "If at first you don't deceive, lie, lie again!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I saw the title and couldn't resist.

16 posted on 07/22/2004 7:26:13 PM PDT by Freebird Forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
If this pans out, my sisters in law have a two-fer.

Be very careful that they don't see this post.....They might sit on you.

17 posted on 07/22/2004 7:29:53 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone

I think the government dependent should be fed something like a Chinese food diet --- a small amount of mean and vegetables and a lot of rice because it's cheap --- it works for Asians. They don't need a lot of meat because they are too sedantary and if you aren't working for a living, you shouldn't need much more than 900 to 1200 calories a day.


18 posted on 07/22/2004 7:30:49 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

They'd have to get off the couch first.


19 posted on 07/22/2004 7:32:37 PM PDT by annyokie (Now with 20% More Infidel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Freebird Forever

There aren't enough taxpayers in this country to fund the treatment for that kind of ugly.


20 posted on 07/22/2004 7:32:41 PM PDT by SilentServiceCPOWife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson