Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: p. henry; Miss Marple; Southack; Mo1; Howlin
So, Clark's book is edited to exonerate Clinton, and the National Archives are "edited" by Sandy Berger to ....

There you have this whole thing in a nutshell.

It all makes sense now....

30 posted on 07/22/2004 2:33:40 PM PDT by Dog (EVERYONE, Please check your socks for inadvertent documents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Southack; Miss Marple

Clarke's book was edit to help with this "jihad against Bush"......could Berger have seen a transcript of Clarke's book last summer...before he went into the National Archives.


34 posted on 07/22/2004 2:38:18 PM PDT by Dog (EVERYONE, Please check your socks for inadvertent documents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Dog
It all makes sense now....

Yes .. but Sandy could very well go to jail for what he did .. and take a few others with him

46 posted on 07/22/2004 2:46:45 PM PDT by Mo1 (50 States .... I want all 50 States come November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Dog

That is what I've been saying for the past two days. I hope that Clarke is being looked at as a co-conspirator in the obstruction of a government investigation (the (9/11 commission investigation). I don't know if the commission investigation can be considered official, but if the testimony was under oath, I would think so. I hope that there some evidence to tie Gorelick into this as well, because I am sure that some of those notes pertained to the wall of separation that Gorelick had set up.


50 posted on 07/22/2004 2:49:33 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson