Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Most Effective Way to Prevent Terrorism is missing from 9-11 Report, Libertarians Say
Libertarian Party Newspaper ^ | 7-22-04 | George Getz

Posted on 07/22/2004 1:49:15 PM PDT by SmithPatterson

Most effective way to prevent terrorism

is missing from 911 report, Libertarians say

WASHINGTON, DC -- The report by the September 11 commission is missing

one obvious way the U.S. government could reduce the chance of another

terrorist attack, Libertarians say: Quit meddling in foreign nations.

"The intelligence reform needed most right now is a more intelligent

foreign policy," says Libertarian presidential candidate Michael

Badnarik. "Pulling U.S. troops out of nations where they don't belong

would make America much safer than appointing a thousand new

intelligence czars."

The report by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the

United States, released on Thursday in Washington, notes that the

government missed up to 10 opportunities to unravel the September 11

plot because of bureaucratic bungling among 15 U.S. intelligence

agencies. It recommends creating a new multi-agency center to fight

terrorism; appointing a single director of national intelligence; and

strengthening congressional oversight of intelligence agencies.

Unfortunately, the politicians who authored the 600-page report chose to

overlook the simplest way to protect America, Badnarik says: Adopt a

foreign policy of neutrality and non-intervention.

"Most Americans would be shocked to learn that U.S. troops are deployed

in more than 100 nations around the globe," he said. "Putting U.S.

troops in volatile, anti-American regions such as the Middle East makes

them tempting targets for terrorists."

In fact, terrorists attacked several U.S. targets -- such as the USS

Cole and the World Trade Center -- before the catastrophic events of

September 11, and each time made it clear that they were reacting to

U.S. foreign policy in the region.

"You don't see terrorists targeting other prosperous, Western-style

democracies such as Switzerland, Canada or Sweden," he said. "And one

reason is that those governments don't meddle in other nation's affairs

or embark on foolish nation-building missions."

For decades, he noted, the U.S. government has provided military and

financial aid to both Israel and its Arab enemies, has sided both with

Iran and Iraq in their bitter, 10-year war and has routinely supported

and armed brutal dictatorships around the world -- so politicians

shouldn't pretend that they're shocked when Americans become targets for

terrorists.

That's why the biggest missed opportunity of all is the government's

refusal to reform U.S. foreign policy, Libertarians say.

"Instead of making America safer, Republicans and Democrats have opted

once again to make government bigger," he said. "When will they learn

that the best way to protect Americans at home is to quit making enemies

abroad?"


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: 911commissionreport; badnarik; libertarianparty; lp; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: SmithPatterson

"You don't see terrorists targeting other prosperous, Western-style democracies such as Switzerland, Canada or Sweden," he said. "And one reason is that those governments don't meddle in other nation's affairs"

OK, I guess it's time for the Israelis to target Europe for some terrorist attacks; because the EU-NAZIs have really meddled bigtime in Israeli affairs. Don't hold your breath waiting for that to happen. Do you think it's possible our nation's Islamic enemies just happen to be depraved killers?


41 posted on 07/22/2004 3:15:08 PM PDT by doug9732
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ServesURight
Ron Paul is a Republican now,

Ron is a RINO. Ballot access laws in Texas prevent him from running as a Libertarian. He is a member of the Libertarian party and the Republican party supported his opposition in the primary.

42 posted on 07/22/2004 3:21:08 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Sam the Sham
Hey, the NVA and Viet Cong paid a horrendous human cost for their victory.

And if it weren't for Walter Cronkite, and possibly the French, they never would have had a victory.

43 posted on 07/22/2004 3:24:59 PM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior
I am not certain, but somewhere in Libertarian literature it must be written that one is permitted to defend oneself against an imminent threat.

Only after the missiles are fired.

44 posted on 07/22/2004 3:32:30 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson

The Party of self-abuse.


45 posted on 07/22/2004 3:37:29 PM PDT by verity (The Liberal Media is America's Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Actually, when it comes to foreign policy, the two don't seem to be too far off.

Kerry, I believe, is committed to staying with Iraq until they can function; Harry Browne, I believe, would pull out as soon as he could leaving Iraq open to anarchy.

46 posted on 07/22/2004 3:38:49 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA

Kerry would do whatever the polls tell him to do.


47 posted on 07/22/2004 3:41:00 PM PDT by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson

The Open-Borders Party is giving advice on terrorism prevention!

In other news: the Green Party is asking Congress to relocate the Yucca Mountain facility to Yellowstone.


48 posted on 07/22/2004 3:42:48 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson
But the Speaker for the Commission stated " Most importantly the lack of imagination!!!".... what a bunch of FV<K3N Clowns.
49 posted on 07/22/2004 3:43:15 PM PDT by Porterville (Your sensitivity offends me you disgusting liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

You got that right,but left out the Russians/KBG and the American Commies!


50 posted on 07/22/2004 3:58:36 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Oh yeah,"check" government spending? The ONLY Libertarian in Congress,is Ron Paul,who could NEVER get elected as a Libertarian,so he runs as a REPUBLICAN and votes with the damned Dems.Yep,that's how to "check" the "evil" GOPers alright,un huh,you bet,right...NOT!

A thoroughly illogical post. He has voted against all lavish spending programs that have been promoted by the GOP and the Dems. If that isn't checking spending, what is?

51 posted on 07/22/2004 5:55:49 PM PDT by inquest (Judges are given the power to decide cases, not to decide law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: inquest
It's NOTHING! Ron Paul votes against about 99% of all GOP Bills,no matter WHAT they are.He hasn't done anything at all to make anything better.He votes WITH Dems.

But he writes papers,that a very tiny group of FREEPERS applaud.His empty words fill you with happiness.His actions have done nothing,to some harm.But hey,keep right on worshiping your beloved idol,an idol with feet of clay tight up to his chin.

52 posted on 07/22/2004 6:02:24 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: KingofQue

"What nations should we pull out of and what nations should we stay in? In your opinion?"


Pull out of Iraq once they are able to hold an election and police their own country.

Pull out of Afghanistan once they are able to do the same.

Pull out of Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Arabian peninsula. Keep our military forces stationed in Israel, which shouldn't be too much to ask, given how much military aid we give them annually.


Since I'm sure you'll disagree with the above and insist on being the World's Policeman, then how about withdrawing our 100,000 European troops and re-deploying them in the Arabian nations of necessity instead? Europe surely is in no need of our military presence any longer with the fall of the Warsaw Pact.

Also, there's no need being served by the 47,000 troops in Japan either. We can maintain our Pacific territories by redeploying them across the Pacific into US-held territory instead. Any leftovers can be shipped to Iraq, etc.


53 posted on 07/22/2004 6:19:47 PM PDT by Blzbba (Hillary Clinton - Dawn of a New Error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson

The borders are already open and the drug trade is booming in the ME. Whats left?


54 posted on 07/22/2004 6:21:21 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Ron Paul votes against about 99% of all GOP Bills,no matter WHAT they are.

Really? He voted against the tax cut?

He hasn't done anything at all to make anything better.He votes WITH Dems.

Illogic on top of illogic. If he's voting against spending, then he's voting to check spending. This isn't a difficult concept, even for you.

55 posted on 07/23/2004 6:37:53 AM PDT by inquest (Judges are given the power to decide cases, not to decide law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba

I have no problem pulling out of Europe, Japan. We are already out of Saudi Arabia. If we pull out of Mid East you can kiss our economy goodbye. Although the Democrats say " War for oil " they are only partially right. It is a war for access to oil. We are more than willing to pay the going rate for oil. What we can't have is someone, al qaeda, Russia, China, Iran dictating oil policy for the west.
Alternate energy sources need to be created and reserves found, ANWAR, and developed. Cut dependence on Arab oil and those pesky terrorists will wither on the vine. Combine that with food embargo and we have a winning combination.


56 posted on 07/23/2004 7:32:40 PM PDT by KingofQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: KingofQue

"I have no problem pulling out of Europe, Japan. We are already out of Saudi Arabia. If we pull out of Mid East you can kiss our economy goodbye. Although the Democrats say " War for oil " they are only partially right. It is a war for access to oil. We are more than willing to pay the going rate for oil. What we can't have is someone, al qaeda, Russia, China, Iran dictating oil policy for the west.
Alternate energy sources need to be created and reserves found, ANWAR, and developed. Cut dependence on Arab oil and those pesky terrorists will wither on the vine. Combine that with food embargo and we have a winning combination"



That is an excellent suggestion and intelligent response. Thanks for correcting me on Saudi ARabia military lack-of-presence and for this post!


57 posted on 07/24/2004 4:11:36 PM PDT by Blzbba (Hillary Clinton - Dawn of a New Error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson

Gee, what a strategy the "Libertarians" propose. Why giving each American a pillow case and bag of cotton balls is a whole lot cheaper than the war on terror -- that we can agree.


58 posted on 07/24/2004 4:14:02 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug9732
OK, I guess it's time for the Israelis to target Europe for some terrorist attacks; because the EU-NAZIs have really meddled bigtime in Israeli affairs.

Are you implying that Europe is anti-Israel? Germany sold them three nuclear submarines; indeed, many Europeon nations sell weapons to Israel. They also do much business with Israel, pumping much money into their economy.

True, the EU nations also critisize Israel (just as Israel critisizes Europeon nations). And Europe does business with Arabs too. So Europeans may not be as one-sidedly pro-Israel as is the US. But even so, Israel benefits enormously from Europe, economically and militarily. Europe is hardly an "EU-NAZI" bastion, despite the talk radio racial slurs about "cheese-eating surrender monkeys."

59 posted on 08/03/2004 9:56:37 PM PDT by Commie Basher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson