Sandy Berger's Sock Stuffing (photos of stuffing his sox w/ docs)

Wonkette ^ | July 22, 2004 | Ana Marie Cox

[Cableguy]

Sandy Berger's Sock Stuffing: Examining the Single Braces Theory

We love it when people put their money where their mouth is. Or their classified documents where their ankles are. Or their socks where their pants are. Or put their socks in their pants along with classified documents. In any case, hats off to blogger Myrick, who performed an experiment to test the GSS (Gigantic Sock Scenario) explanation of the Berger bruhaha. Sure, he may have taken sensitive government secrets out of the national archives, but could he have fit them in his socks? There is only one way to find out.

Armed with a pair of mid-length dress socks and a Brooks Brothers' sock suspenders I attempted walking about my house with various materials – both with and without the braces.

His results will shock you!

[Cableguy]

Link to the blogger who tried this experiment:

http://myrick.blogspot.com/2004/07/berger-sock-experiment.html

[Conspiracy Guy]

I used the same method for shoplifting cartons of cigarettes when I was in college.

[hispanarepublicana]

There's no reason a federal crime can't also result in crafty gifts. Here's another a stuffed sock......

[cripplecreek]

Sox with docs sounds like a Dr Suess title.

I will not stuff them in my pants.

i will not stuff them in with ants.

[GVnana]

LOL!

[snooker]

So the Bergler would have to come prepared. What's news about that? I wear an elastic ankle brace that I bought at wally world for $7 because of a sprained ankle. It will easily hold papers for a long long time. You can wear it under or over the sock.

Maybe he used a couple of large rubber bands. There are plenty of elastic bands that could be placed on the legs beforehand and used to store papers under the pants.

Maybe he wore an ankle holster. Good enough for guns, fine for papers.

Sheesh ... What happened to that imagination thinking of this morning?

[PeterPrinciple]

"I used the same method for shoplifting cartons of cigarettes when I was in college."

I expect a liberal NOT to understand right from wrong, but I do expect a conservative to fully understand that stealing is wrong...........just a reaction to your statement.

[annyokie]

He's kidding, already.

[Izzy Dunne]

There's no reason a federal crime can't also result in crafty gifts.

Send that one to Martha Stewart.

[martin_fierro]

Would you, could you, in your hose?

Would you, could you, lie through your nose?

[The KG9 Kid]

He was a liberal then: He was in college.

[hispanarepublicana]

I will not stuff them near my tush
I will not give them to George Bush

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

[keat]

Like so?

I did not stuff them in a box.
I did not stuff them in my socks.

I did not stuff them here or there.
I did not stuff them anywhere. /seuss

[martin_fierro]

You should not take them on the lam.

I do not like you, Sam-I-Cram.

[cripplecreek]

We're on a roll.


I did not stuff them in a hole

i did not eat them on a roll.

[Walkingfeather]

You folks making light of this really do not understand what is going on.

[TigersEye]

Did you find any errors in his spelling?

[New Perspective]

[atomicpossum]

Oh, heck, as a sneaky teen I used to smuggle all manner of 'literary' contraband this way....