All that can easily be refuted or denied by the clintonoids.
I believe they were all middle east terror acts but there's not enough proof for Berger to risk his freedom to cover it up.
I absolutely agree with your analysis. I don't think it is related to those "incidents" because there have already been hints *made by the dems in power then* that they were terror related.
No, this is something MUCH bigger, I think.
Care to share your theories?