Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VeritatisSplendor

"Nobody on this thread is asking, let alone answering, the obvious question: if all this is true, why is Bush continuing the coverup?"

Possibilities that I see:

1. Bush is continuing the coverup because he is part of the good old boy network of corrupt officials. There are bodies buried on borh sides of the aisles so everybne protects each other about the big stuff. Mutually Assured Destruction philosophy insures both parties survive.

2. Bush and Ashcroft have stupidly been relying on the major media to learn about everything and they are clueless.

3. Bush and Ashcroft know that they can't obtain convictions on anything and that it would be a net loss for the country if they attempted to persue truth and justice in these matters.

4. We are wrong about TWA 800, MENA, VWF, Chinagate and everything else.



142 posted on 07/23/2004 5:31:32 AM PDT by UnChained
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: UnChained
I simply don't believe your possible explanations 1) and 2). Explanation 4) is incoherent, I am only concerned here with TWA 800, and 4) simply avoids the question.

Explanation 3) has some plausibility, but who said anything about prosecutions and convictions? Bush could just release info, and only prosecute if there was a public outcry for it or if the facts were actually serious enough and solid enough that prosecution is mandatory and non-discretionary, in which case the political factors would FAVOR releasing the info.

146 posted on 07/23/2004 10:12:28 AM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

To: UnChained
I simply don't believe your possible explanations 1) and 2). Explanation 4) is incoherent, I am only concerned here with TWA 800, and 4) simply avoids the question.

Explanation 3) has some plausibility, but who said anything about prosecutions and convictions? I'm just asking for Bush to release info. If there was a public outcry for it, or if the facts were actually serious enough and unquestionable enough that prosecution is mandatory and non-discretionary, he can prosecute, but in that case it would not be politically costly to do so.

147 posted on 07/23/2004 10:16:50 AM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

To: UnChained

Sorry for double post -- I accidentally hit "post" button while editing, didn't notice, then posted final version. Too bad I can't stuff the earlier version in my pants, it's out there for all to see....


148 posted on 07/23/2004 10:19:21 AM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson