I agree 100 percent.
Long time lurker, first post: I know you all don't watch much Nightline, but I watched it tonite and Richard Clarke was on and what he said may be interesting for this discussion. His biggest point was that Bush failed to "get personally involved" in the terrorism issue after being warned a strike was coming, unlike Bill Clinton who got really involved and serious after he was warned about the millinuem threat! Can you believe it? Clarke was adamant that Clinton responded forcefully and intensely to the Y2k threat, and then by extension, that Bush dropped the ball.
I think this is the centerpiece of the Clinton Legacy project that these people are engaged in, so if those drafts show ANYTHING to the contrary, then these guys really are ruined, because it will be black and white they perpetrated a charade and it was they who were cavalier and political and shameless in refusing to address the terrorism threat appropriately. No doubt that Richard Clarke, by appearing on Nightline with his curious take on things, has demonstrated he is also at the center of this. I just couldn't believe that his main point dealt directly with the issue reflected in the missing Berger docs and that this incredible link wasn't even noticed by Nightline - it just made me so mad I had to register and tell y'all.