Exactly, litte comments and notes that might have been seen as just typical Clinton b.s. in a non 9/11 world might seem unforgivably arrogant in our actual post-9/11 world. Just like how Clinton tried desperately to scrub the info about the Long Island Association Speech. But evenmoreso, is that the content of these drafts might have proved beyond any doubt that their post-9/11 rhetoric about what happened in the Clinton administration does not match the public record and that they have compounded their lie with more lies. Well, of course they did - we all know that. HA!
America's security really suffers when these people are trying to write history that revolves just around them. They still to this day are impeding our reaction to 9/11 by altering the truth to fit their egotistic desires - I almost hope they have a more diabolical excuse, because it's so pathetic.
Precisely. Remember the side margin notes he had about the fund raisers?
No matter what, we are STILL talking "legacy" here. He won't EVER give up on that.
What puzzles me is why Berger would even consider doing this; what could be worth this?