It's ALWAYS in the 'footnotes'.....
Now.....I get it.
I still find it astonishing that Berger would engage in such an easily detectable and high-risk maneuver. To protect Clinton? He would risk humility, financial ruin, and imprisonment for BJ? Why? And Why now?
It is difficult to imagine that anything in those documents could be damaging to him personally, and after reviewing them, he could have at least avoided perjuring himself at the 9-11 hearings. But it is very easy to imagine the archives might contain information that the Clinton's thought OK to leave behind, but which could have been very damaging given 9-11.
So, why would Berger risk so much? Loyalty? Naaah. Arrogance? Perhaps. Fear of what might be in his FBI file? Hmmmm.....