Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: somemoreequalthanothers; kanawa; Howlin; Southack; AHerald; bayourod; Mad_Tom_Rackham; GeronL
see# 412,,,,,,FYI.....ping

It's ALWAYS in the 'footnotes'.....

413 posted on 07/22/2004 4:02:33 PM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies ]


To: maestro

Now.....I get it.


415 posted on 07/22/2004 4:28:41 PM PDT by somemoreequalthanothers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies ]

To: maestro
Yes. He of course went back repeatedly to get all of the copies with the incriminating notes, and returned all but those.

I still find it astonishing that Berger would engage in such an easily detectable and high-risk maneuver. To protect Clinton? He would risk humility, financial ruin, and imprisonment for BJ? Why? And Why now?

It is difficult to imagine that anything in those documents could be damaging to him personally, and after reviewing them, he could have at least avoided perjuring himself at the 9-11 hearings. But it is very easy to imagine the archives might contain information that the Clinton's thought OK to leave behind, but which could have been very damaging given 9-11.

So, why would Berger risk so much? Loyalty? Naaah. Arrogance? Perhaps. Fear of what might be in his FBI file? Hmmmm.....

416 posted on 07/22/2004 7:46:19 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Havoc be upon them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson