Replies

Come to think of it, my analysis is a bit off, because back when he was pilfering the documents, Kerry wasn't the nominee.

You know, you're the first person I've seen bring this point up. Back in September and October '03 Howard Dean was the inevitable nominee, and Kerry was floundering with everyone else in the Dem pack. I even thought Gephardt had a better shot than Kerry for a while.

So, he's stealing multiple drafts of a Clinton-era document, at a time when he couldn't have really been doing this for Kerry (since no remotely rational person would risk his reputation and jail time for someone that "didn't have a chance" at being the nominee). This all adds up to him covering his own fanny and that of the Clintonistas. Great point!

Well thanks. But....I sure wish I knew the whole scoop on this! No matter what his motives or who they meant to benefit they wreak of "cover-up" and are not inadvertent one bit. And no matter how the dems try and spin it, he looks corrupt at worst and at the very least, very, very, scatterbrained! Not GOOD! And he was an adviser and a potential cabinet nominee. Sheez! To me it makes all of the lot look bad, from Clinton right down to Kerry. His actions have tainted all of them!