Posted on 07/21/2004 11:05:17 AM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan
LOL !! Good one, dead. :^D
Is there a link or transcript of this by any chance?
Remember John Loftus was the guy who screamed that the $oddomite was killed during the first bombing we did last year.
He is a liberal and stretches the truth about his intel connecions.
So I have zero reliance to anything he writes or says.
Having said the above. It would not surprise me that the Clintoons used al Qaeda. If they did, they were paid to do so by the Opecker Princes and thugs to kill the Serbs/Yugoslavs.
Thanks for your post at #5.
At Reagan's funeral the x42's looked to me like they were deeply on drugs. hillary looked crashed out and blubba looked like he was on something to make him able to escape from his surroundings while also feeling "good." I know they are degenerating before our eyes but at the funeral, they looked much worse than usual. Understanding that they were in enemy territory didn't explain it sufficiently to me. Perhaps the Dorian Grey Syndrome is reversing. Having ultimate power and using it to crush all opposition works in America for a time (eight years if the criminal is re-elected). But then there are elections, which, if not wrested out of the hands of the American people by vote fraud, can have some nasty repercussions for the guilty. I wonder if the x42's ever really thought about the weight of all their crimes, and guilty consciences, catching up with them some day.
I don't remember Loftus so thanks for the clarification. Nonetheless, it would be an interesting scenario.
Another good one.
I'm wondering if anyone is investigating the possibility of some collusion among the Archives staff, and if Bergler's clearance has been invalidated yet.
It matters a great deal if one wants to know what was so darn important that Berger would fall on his sword for x42.
I read Zhangliqun's question about "we" as meaning, "the American people" getting the information through the appropriate legal authorities, which is one of my biggest questions right now: are "we" ever going to get this information?
God, I hate what the clintons have done to America.
Remember Waco -- under a dem president.
Agreed. However having the option of keeping quiet, and 'not going there' he clearly chose to do so and bring this charge up. And being a Dem one has to wonder why he would do so; there is NO good news there for Clinton or Berger re: his theory.
BTW I have talked with John Loftus quite a bit this week when the Wilson thing was high coverage. Hammered him for letting personal relations get in the way. Here's his wrap-up on Joe Wilson:
"...drop the gop/dem angle and look for the larger intell picture. Joe, and the CIA were duped by libyan/french intell. They came to the wrong conclusions for the right reasons. q (Quadaffi) is on our side for the moment and is telling all. Do you think i would stick my neck out like this merely because Joe and I are both democrats? the french/libyan/iraqi uranium connection will probably get bush reelected. the truth is post partisan..."
What he swiped, according to some, were the draft copies that contained the review comments (i.e "marginal notes") of the various Clinton administration reviewers. In that these "marginal notes" may, or may not, have been incorporated into the final version, we will never know what the "marginal notes" may, or may not, have contained.
Given that the theft was a felony, the draft copies with "marginal notes" are now missing, and the the thief was a National Security Advisor....
It would be safe to assume that the "marginal notes" were very damaging to the Clinton administration in both subject matter and content.
One of the characteristics of a sociopathic personality is a complete lack of conscience, guilty or not. The clintons believe they have never done anything wrong.
This is true, but they act like they know they're doing wrong; else why ALL the coverups and coverup attempts. Raiding Vince Foster's office and sealing it off to proper investigative authorities, shredding Rose Law Firm papers, continually destroying evidence, you know the drill. And now this. There seems to me to be some appreciation of culpability if caught with damning information. "Destroy the evidence" is their mantra. So while I do believe they have sociopathic traits, they also indicate a sense of guilt and culpability and a fear of being caught.
Did you watch them at Reagan's funeral? If so, what do you think of my assessment of them being zoned out (bill) and strung out (hillary) on drugs?
what be up with that? if they had em once, they can get em again.
Well, we know Clinton kept his cigars in a box, but not necessarily in a fox. Algore wanted to put social security proceeds in a box with lox. And we know Berger puts stuff in his sox.
It also matters a great deal to the Dems. That's all I hear on TV. "They were only copies, so no harm done." They have done a terrific job of taking attention away from the real POINT. No one should fall for this tactic.
I read Zhangliqun's question about "we" as meaning, "the American people" getting the information through the appropriate legal authorities, which is one of my biggest questions right now: are "we" ever going to get this information?
Not any time soon. But your very biggest question should be, which other persons, who did not have the clearance and so are no more entitled to see that information than you or I are, DID get to see it anyway?
See why it doesn't matter if it was "only copies"?
It is amazing how all of this falls into place:")
"Not in a box! Not in a fox! Not in a lox! But in a Sox!
"Well, we know Clinton kept his cigars in a box, but not necessarily in a fox. Algore wanted to put social security proceeds in a box with lox. And we know Berger puts stuff in his sox."
At the funeral I think the clintons were just being the clintons. If they believe they are not the focus of attention, they revert to their narcissistic base behavior. These people are nothing more than sociopathic megalomaniacs who have been granted extraordinary fame and fortune by those who adore them aided by those who hate them.
Fortunately, if God wants to punish someone, he first makes them famous.
Thanks for your insight to John.
I still have problems with him that I can't state on a board or even in person.
Hopefully, he is doing the right thing here for the right reasons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.