Posted on 07/21/2004 7:56:57 AM PDT by rhema
Marriage is not even a significant institution in the black community. Most likely it is because they don't want gays competing with them for civil rights attention.
That's nailing the issue good! The gay rights thing is largely a white liberal goal, and it must be really galling to blacks to watch attempts to link a sexual perversion cause to civil rights for black Americans.
In fact, the same moral failings that gave us slavery and segregation also have given us the concept of homosexual marriage. You might just as well try to re-impose slavery using the same rationale, by couching it in terms of a struggle for someone's "rights."
Against homosexual marriage but then explain the whole concept of "Being on the down low" to us....
What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda |
|
Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1) |
|
Myth and Reality about Homosexuality--Sexual Orientation Section, Guide to Family Issues" |
The ideals of the right are much more homogeneous and compatible with each other than those of the left. The left is made up of competing and fractured social interests.
bttt
Oh? So riddle me this, Brilliant. It is more than apparent that American blacks do not approve of homosexual marriage. That's good. But why must this rightful position be thrown away by you because you ascribe an ulterior motive for their disapproval for homosexual "marriage"?
$710.96... The price of freedom.
The whole article is misleading. The title should read "Black & right: Black Religious Leaders in America almost uniformly opposed to homosexual marriage." You are correct in stating that the institution of marriage is given little thought in the black community in general. There is a very high rate of unwed black mothers and too many black siblings with different fathers.
How can you consider their position on marriage righteous when marriage is almost nonexistent in the black community?
Nope. First things first. I asked you first. Answer, then I'll answer yours.
Why ascribe an ulterior motive for the disapproval of homosexual marriage since that disapproval is the right position?
$710.96... The price of freedom.
Because that's what I believe.
Okay, but that doesn't really tell me anything. Why do you believe that?
$710.96... The price of freedom.
What, are you a shrink, or something? Why do you care?
Personally, I am willing to be proven wrong. If the black community votes for Bush in Nov., I will conclude that it was because they took exception to Kerry's position on gay marriage. If they vote for Kerry, I will conclude that they were merely opposed to gay marriage because they feared the gays were moving in on their territory.
I'm sorry I'm a little slow this morning, exactly what do you mean when you say the Democrats give "lip service"?
1. The Democrats OPPOSED the Civil Rights Amendments.
2. The Democrats OPPOSED The SCHOOL VOUCHERS to help
educate the minorities.
3. The Democrats SUPPORT the HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA.
NEED WE SAY ANY MORE!
*** DING DING DING *** No more calls; we have a winner!
Irrelevant question. To illustrate with another example: If somebody wanted to kill Osama bin Laden because Osama ran over his cat in 1979, the fact that killing Osama is justified for greater reasons doesn't change the fact that this particular person is acting from an "ulterior motive".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.