Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Berger on the 'Wall'
Wall Street Journal ^ | July 21, 2004 | Editorial

Posted on 07/21/2004 5:25:22 AM PDT by OESY

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: AFPhys

Yes, the originals are important.

Never-the-less, the dims must consider us to be totally whacko, because we have WJC coming out saying they are all laughing about it. ie, Sandy Berger is sloppy.

And yes, "inadvertently" is not even possible. Wrong word here.
Nothing gets into anyone's pants, inadvertently???!!!??? Or socks either, I might add.

Glad as you say, some can not be copied.

My wonderment is that as I looked today............the news papers aren't talking about it.

Is there too much news today, just to ignore this?
You know..........wait it out and it goes away.



21 posted on 07/21/2004 5:51:33 PM PDT by LadyPilgrim (Sealed my pardon with His blood, Hallelujah!!! What a Savior!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
In addition, this "drafts" business has a possibility that I had not considered until now. Suppose that the "marginal notes" or "comments" someone placed on a draft consisted of "PostIt notes"? (For example: Remove this reference to OBL being offered by Sudan - WJC) ... How would this be attached permanently to that draft copy for the sake of the archives?

I can never remember anyone using postit notes when editing or commenting classified documents. I can't imagine it being good practice. The work I did was in the generation of reports (analysis of radar imaging data - both theoretical and measured). This is in contrast with classified reports treated as inter-office memos or briefings like the docs Berger seems to have been after.
22 posted on 07/22/2004 10:16:23 AM PDT by tang-soo (Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tang-soo

Thanks for the response about "post-its" - I finally saw it.

Those little doboppies weren't even invented yet when I was dealing with classified, so it wasn't an issue at all.

I would be surprised if it is even "legal" to do so in connection with this TS+ stuff, but wanted to ask someone who might know.

BY the Way: I've referred many Grateful FReepers to your excellent rundown --- I'm glad you posted is so many times, and so are they.
.


23 posted on 07/23/2004 10:49:36 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
Thanks for the response about "post-its" - I finally saw it.

Those little doboppies weren't even invented yet when I was dealing with classified, so it wasn't an issue at all.


You're welcome. Actually, I was also straining to remember if we had post it notes around during my time. Of course we also didn't have cell phones, digital cameras ...etc
24 posted on 07/23/2004 11:24:11 AM PDT by tang-soo (Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson