Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ambrose
He said Mr Berger believed he had been looking at copies of classified documents rather than originals.

An honest mistake. Sandy Burglar was only Clinton's national security advisor. How would he know what an original document looked like? The question is: What difference would it make if it WAS a copy?

Damn these people are good at changing the subject. Hopefully our side will not get sucked into arguing about the timing and who leaked it and all the other sleight of mouth.

6 posted on 07/20/2004 7:33:24 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Eagle
"Damn these people are good at changing the subject.."

You win the prize...this story was leaked by the Dems to deflect for Klintoon, help Kerry and for major Democrat party damage control..it was leaked for POLITICAL reasons .. translation it was leaked by Ashcroft, Cheney or hell Bush himself...see then this becomes the "real story"..after all everything a liberal does is good even if it's bad..lil' Katie on the Today show along with that turncoat RHINO David "Jerkin" started spewing the Dem talking points this morning. After all intention, allegations and emotion trump facts and logic in the "Libers" world.

9 posted on 07/20/2004 8:02:39 PM PDT by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson