Tuesday's NYT story began by saying Berger had "inadvertantly" taken the documents. This is a slight modification, but they have turned up the heat a bit - a sure indication this story is not going to disappear anytime soon.
"Tuesday's NYT story began by saying Berger had "inadvertantly" taken the documents. This is a slight modification, but they have turned up the heat a bit - a sure indication this story is not going to disappear anytime soon."
I am still trying to figure out how old Sandy the Burglar would have gotten those documents out if he had meant to do it.