Skip to comments.
U.N. resolution directs Israel to remove barrier
Bakersfield Californian ^
| 7/20/04
| AP- United Nations
Posted on 07/20/2004 5:28:39 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
To: robertpaulsen
In other words, "Palestine" was set aside for the Jews, while the majority of it had already been cut off and given to the Arabs.
41
posted on
07/21/2004 9:02:53 AM PDT
by
rmlew
(Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
To: rmlew
1923: Trans-Jorden to the east of the river, Palestine to the west. The Jews were to settle in Palestine among the Palestinians. At that time, nothing was "set aside" exclusively for the Jews.
Unless you can point me to some documentation supporting your statements "these lands were ceded for the Jewish statein 1923" and "Palestine" was set aside for the Jews", you're wasting my time with your proclamations.
To: robertpaulsen
Yes, in that Israeli masons have this tendency to build walls miles into territory that does not belong to them -- our southern border would end up going through Mexico City.The West Bank land doesn't belong to the Paleostinians. So for very rational security reasons Israel has built the wall into some places on the West Bank. And to encompass some settlements. They won't say so but many Paleostinians are very happy to be on the Israel side of the security barrier. Sure beats living under Arafat and Hamas.
This security fence is the price to be paid for terrorism and murder of Jews in Israel. The last real government in the West Bank was Jordan until 1967. And the Paleostinians never complained about "occupation"
43
posted on
07/21/2004 9:32:01 AM PDT
by
dennisw
(Once is Happenstance. Twice is Coincidence. The third time is Enemy action. - Ian Fleming)
To: robertpaulsen
1.I was paraphrasing you.
2. I did not say "exclusively for the Jews."Perhaps you areconfusingmy statement with that of Churchill.
44
posted on
07/21/2004 10:22:24 AM PDT
by
rmlew
(Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
To: NormsRevenge; SJackson; yonif; Simcha7; American in Israel; spectacularbid2003; Binyamin; ...
45
posted on
07/21/2004 11:41:32 AM PDT
by
Salem
(FREE REPUBLIC - Fighting to win within the Arena of the War of Ideas! So get in the fight!)
To: Salem
I know this is a loaded question but can there be anything else on G-d's green earth that would be a bigger pointless waste of time?1. Instructing Bill Clinton on the joys of chastity.
2. Instructing John Kerry on virtues of consistancy.
3. Instructing Rachel Corrie on Newtonian physics.
To: Salem
P.S.
4. Trying to instruct a certain Jewhating freeper in history, logic, and morality.
Comment #48 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson