Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cyncooper
But the sources close to Berger said there were other copies of the drafts, that the commission had the final version of the report and that Clarke had said there were not significant changes during the drafting process.

I want to see what Clarke actually said. And what he thinks now, now his prior words are becoming an excuse.

"not significant changes" - If they weren't significant, Berger wouldn't have taken them.

4 posted on 07/20/2004 10:51:16 AM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Shermy
If they weren't significant, Berger wouldn't have taken them.

Indeed...

7 posted on 07/20/2004 10:53:29 AM PDT by cyncooper ("We will fear no evil...And we will prevail")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Shermy

And I guess we're just supposed to take Clarke's word for it?

I don't think so.


15 posted on 07/20/2004 11:00:42 AM PDT by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Shermy
But the sources close to Berger said there were other copies of the drafts, that the commission had the final version of the report and that Clarke had said there were not significant changes during the drafting process.

I'd like to see the Commission actually make these comments, not "sources close to Berger."

51 posted on 07/20/2004 11:27:40 AM PDT by My2Cents ("Fair, balanced...and unafraid.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson