To: gopwinsin04
What the hell does "willing to cooperate" mean? How much cooperation does your average criminal give when he's caught en flagrante dilecto?
23 posted on
07/20/2004 10:03:32 AM PDT by
Adrastus
(If you don't like my attitude, talk to someone else.)
To: Adrastus
I work in LE and the case begins to get built when the suspect opens his mouth. They've probably got a book built up now. Sandy is going DOWN! No OJ here.
24 posted on
07/20/2004 10:04:40 AM PDT by
gunnygail
("The bad thing about this country is that everyone gets their say," Bubba Klinton)
To: Adrastus
Co-operate?
S.Berger: "Yes, sir Mr. Prosecutor, I live in the United States. I have nothing else to say."
That's about it.
34 posted on
07/20/2004 10:09:00 AM PDT by
Mr. Jazzy
(I think James Brown said it best, "Shabbbbab-brezeee, nahn, uuhhh, Can't hep myseff.")
To: Adrastus
Wolf Blitzer just got through about 10 minutes of this on CNN.
I learned:
- The whole thing happened about 10 months ago. Why Berger is just now issuing statements about being willing to "cooperate" is puzzling.
- Apparently, more than one witness said they saw Sandy stuffing the documents into his socks.
- When asked if the incident might have been captured on video, the guest "expert" didn't know. Since Burger's mouthpiece is denying he took the documents out in his socks, a video, if one exists, would put him into deep doo-doo.
- Wolf spent about 5 of the 10 minutes trying to turn the discussion into speculation on the timing of the leak and that it had to be the dastardly Republicans, to turn attention away from the 9/11 smear due out Thursday. The reporter from USA Today had to bring him back by reminding him that regardless of timing, it didn't excuse Burger's actions. Wolf quickly shut up.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson