To: spectre
Posted by spectre to rhombus On News/Activism ^ 07/20/2004 9:39:42 AM EDT #46 of 50 ^ "This is the first article I have seen where he put documents in his "pants pocket". Initial articles just said pants. We should be careful not to overplay our hand here... it is being stated that he stuffed documents down his pants. Of course this is no way lets this guy off the hook but we will be accused of smear and distortion if we don't get our facts straight. I just heard Lanny Davis on CNN speak of Berger stuffing the documents into his "socks". He said "socks more than once, BTW. So which is it? Socks or pants or both?
This is an extremely surprising thing for Lanny Davis to say... are we being set up here?
51 posted on
07/20/2004 6:50:08 AM PDT by
rhombus
To: rhombus
I blush at the thought I am the ONLY person on this forum who watched that interview on CNN this morning...
sw
56 posted on
07/20/2004 7:01:12 AM PDT by
spectre
(Spectre's wife (I was just channel surfing..honestly)
To: rhombus
So which is it? Socks or pants or both? Wasnt this covered in the 92 campaign?
57 posted on
07/20/2004 7:02:25 AM PDT by
woofie
( I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize.)
To: rhombus
Sandy Berger will not be prosecuted. Bush's advisers will tell him it would not help him get votes in November. Enforcing the laws is only a secondary interest of W's administration.
65 posted on
07/20/2004 11:26:28 AM PDT by
doug9732
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson