I think I'm with you, but can you explain it a little further?
That is when, January" the 911 Commission asked for an extension, Clarke's book was going to be late three months.
"I think I'm with you, but can you explain it a little further?"
Berger is stealing documents October 2003, Richard Clarke is writing his book. Now it is not until January that the house of Berger gets searched. At the end of January is when the Commission requested an extension of 90 days, and Clarke's book was due out at the end of that extension.
Congress authorizes a 60 day extension for the Commission and miracle of miracles, Richard Clarke's book gets published a month early.
Richard Clarke is treated by the Commission as the "second coming" and he presents himself as the Number 1 on counter-terrorism. Condi Rice was treated as though she was a second class citizen and Sandy Berger as a sage in public testimony.
John Ashcroft pulled the rug out from under Gorelick by outing her wall and suggested there was more where that came from.
I have a gut feeling that bjclinton had no clue what was going on about "terrorism", that Hillry was running the show and that is why Clinton was not meeting with the CIA director, yet there were claims of meetings at the White House nearly every day with CIA, DOJ, STATE, Pentagon, Berger. Surely Clarke was in the meetings and more than likely so was Hillry.
It seems that it was hoped that the Berger theft could be kept quiet until at least after the election or maybe serve the purpose of intentionally being leaked prior to, so the negative impact would reflect most upon JFKerry cause Berger was his National Security Guy....