To: King Prout
Botulinum toxin in a water tower is a more credible scenario. Cheaper and just as deadly. 3000 toxin casualties would strain the antitoxin supplies in the US and a lot would die. All the terrorist would have to do is crawl to the top of a water tower and drop a small ten milliliter vial of toxin into the water. Even filtration wouldn't remove it and by the time someone realized it was the water it would be too late. Nukes are too expensive and difficult.
29 posted on
07/19/2004 7:50:38 PM PDT by
vetvetdoug
(In memory of S/Sgt. Segundo "Dean" Baldonado, Albuquerque, NM-KIA Bien Hoa AFB, RVN 1965)
To: vetvetdoug
something utterly conventional... like a nutter driving a tanker full of gasoline into a college... is a MUCH more likely scenario.
33 posted on
07/19/2004 7:52:23 PM PDT by
King Prout
("Thou has been found guilty and convicted of malum zambonifactum most foul... REPENT!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson