On another thread it was reported that the Archivist put secret marks on the docs.
Looking forward to a well roasted Burger.
Mark Levin: This is why Berger stole the documents and 'lost' them
Posted by holdonnow to woofie
On News/Activism 07/19/2004 10:15:47 PM PDT #113 of 127
This should be a very, very big deal, and the Democrats will attempt to do everything possible to kill it. It's big because it is a crime to destroy government property, including classified documents, and to obstruct a government investigation (9/11 investigation). The information that was destroyed, to the extent we know about it thanks to Ashcroft's testimony, most likely showed the extent to which the Clinton administration failed to adopt recommended policies to fight terrorism. And my guess is that some of those recommendations must have had some relevance to stopping what would become 9/11, otherwise Berger would not have risked everything to get to them. Have a good night.
Is that the same archivist who gave Bruce Lindsey the heads-up?