No decision on whether Sandy Berger should face charges
AP ^ | 7.19.04
So what's the problem? The Republicans are in charge now.
Arrest the p.o.s. Berger, cuff him, slam his head into the door of the cop car, and then throw him into a holding cell with a bunch of hairy creeps until he is bailed out. I am sick of waiting for the Republicans to DO something about the scumbag Democrats and their corruption. So don't mealy-mouth me with lame excuses.
I stand by my earlier remarks.
You may not think so in your current state, but I will continue to believe that GWB knows one helluva lot more than I do.
No mealy mouth from me. There are just ways to do things when you chose to run for elected office. You lose your freedom to act like a normal Joe and go fight your way through your troubles. You have to consider pros and cons, you have to pick your battles, you have to analyze the other side's counter-moves.
But, no, a politician making it all the way to President must conform to your wishes and throw caution to the wind no matter the cost.
This president is running for re-election to the office of President of the U.S. We expect someone who considers his actions and their consequences. There are different ways to handle the same objectives. That is all I am saying - sometimes Bush has weighed the pros and cons and decided to defer action or work behind the scenes rather than incite outlandish reactions and media coverage.
Just why is he not to protect himself and his goals?