It's not FBI files. But I'm with you on the first part. The Bush WH is risk adverse to the point of paralysis. Why weren't they trashing the dems and Clinton admin over their screwup on national security for years? If they won't fight, they will lose this election.
They will say nothng about this for the same reason that they will say nothing about the OKC connections to Iraq.
Bush is a man of his word, and he promised a new tone.
You are right Bush will Not be re-elected if he does not speak out loudly and SOON
Well, I kinda suspect that maybe it is But I'm with you on the first part. The Bush WH is risk adverse to the point of paralysis. Why weren't they trashing the dems and Clinton admin over their screwup on national security for years?
I can only think of 900 possible reasons, but you're on record as discounting them, so I won't try to persuade you.
But for the rest of the Peanut Gallery, yeah, I do suspect that the infamous "900 FBI Files" are holding an awful lot of "G"OPpers in check.
Here's a challenge for the skeptics: Figure out why the impeachment suddenly went South at warp speed when it came to convicting the Sinkmaster, and I'd wager you'll also have the explanation for this administration's "risk adverse to the point of paralysis" behavior.
The dems are still trashing President Bush for the low down dirty campaign he ran against Gore. Everyone and their dog (think Helen Thomas) reported that the campaign contradicted the "new tone" claim. Their biggest gripe - that then candidate Bush had the audacity to state that he and Cheney would bring honor and dignity back to the White House. Can you imagine the uproar if Clinton's cornucopia of national security failures were even mentioned much less completely exposed?