[Peach]

NOBODY can tell us that the former National Security advisor can't tell the difference between copies and originals.

AND, why the heck isn't the 9/11 Commission guarding these papers and those who review them more carefully!!!

[OldFriend]

I gather Berger was sent to the archives to review what documents ought to go to the 9/11 commission. Of course, he made sure that all damning documents disappeared down his pants. Thankfully he was seen, or else there are cameras in the room.

[kcvl]

Berger himself had ordered his anti-terror czar Richard Clarke in early 2000 to write the after-action report and has publicly spoken about how the review brought to the forefront the realization that al-Qaida had reached America's shores and required more attention.

Berger said in testimony earlier this year that during the millennium period, "we thwarted threats and I do believe it was important to bring the principals together on a frequent basis" to more regularly consider terror threats.

The missing documents involve two or three draft versions of the report as it was evolving and being refined by the Clinton administration, according to officials and lawyers. The Archives is believed to have copies of some of the missing documents.

[chiller]

Good point. I want to know who specifically allowed Berger to review these documents. Oh....a 911 commission member perhaps...ah let's see....maybe Jamie Gorelick?

[Mo1]

AND, why the heck isn't the 9/11 Commission guarding these papers and those who review them more carefully!!!

My guess is that Berger took advantage of his status