Here is my last question for today/tonight:
If this happened in October and he claims he returned them within a week and is cooperating, WHY is this STILL being investigated?
Why hasn't the FBI or any prosecutor spoken with him?
What could be taking this long?
The timeline is definitely puzzling.
I'm off to DU to view the carnage. : )
If you ask me, it seems the clinton administration has always had a documentation problem. That problem has extended into just about every government agency DOJ, FBI, NSA, and the National archives just to name a few off the top of my head.
IMHO, if that is the case, then that is quite a few mountains of documents to sort through to figure out what has been altered or is missing -- far more than Enron and that was called a complicated case.
It is only an educated guess...
Beats me. I'm still waiting for someone to speak to Murray Waas about that 20,000-page CIA document dump.
Good night!
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/07/20/berger.probe/index.html
Asked if it unusual that Berger has not yet been interviewed, the government official familiar with the investigation responded that investigators would do so once they are satisfied they have the evidence they need.
Sources close to Berger said they did not believe there was a grand jury impaneled as part of the investigation and that to the best of their knowledge, Clarke and other Clinton administration officials who have knowledge of the documents in question -- and specifically about any changes made in the drafting process of the millennium report -- have not been questioned.