Until I read the whole article, I will assume that those now prohibited from protesting the event were going to do what they did last year - stand on PUBLIC SIDEWALKS. They weren't trying to enter a private building or private organization. They weren't attempting to join a parade. They were standing on a sidewalk.
You think protests should be illegal if those being so protested don't like it?
You think people should be prevented from standing on sidewalks owned by the public because homosexuals don't want them there?
If anyone knows more details, post 'em. I'd like this cleared up.
That's not what the group in question is willing to limit themselves to. From the article:
But organizers from Repent America, a Philadelphia-based Christian organization, say they will attend the events, even if it means defying a court order and getting arrested.