Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xm177e2
Catch-22? I do not think that word means what you think it means...

Me or the Times? I understand that phrase to mean regardless of the situation, you're damned if you do, or you're damned if you don't. Don't expect the Times to make sense writing about guns.

31 posted on 07/18/2004 10:26:23 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: neverdem
Me or the Times? I understand that phrase to mean regardless of the situation, you're damned if you do, or you're damned if you don't. Don't expect the Times to make sense writing about guns.

The Times, of course (they're the ones who used it, not you). I phrased it like that because "I do not think that word means what you think it means" is a quote from a movie.

The Times probably understand "Catch-22" to mean "something illogical and bad," which is what Heller's book "Catch-22" was full of. But you are right, the correct definition is a lose-lose situation.

100 posted on 07/19/2004 2:33:50 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson