Posted on 07/18/2004 9:11:14 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
SACRAMENTO -- By 2006, California could have a dramatically different political landscape, with part-time and more moderate legislators and a more streamlined state bureaucracy, if Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's renewed threats against the status quo catch fire with voters. As the governor fights against a Legislature he says is resisting his calls for change, he is campaigning this weekend against individual lawmakers. He has again threatened to push a ballot measure to create part-time Legislature.
Combined with an open-ballot primary initiative on the November ballot pushed by Schwarzenegger supporters, the crop of politicians elected
in 2006 could find themselves both part-time and term limited.
"To the extent he gets stymied by a Legislature unwilling to come to grip with the issues, I think the voters are going to be totally sympathetic to making significant changes," says Sal Russo, a veteran Republican consultant.
The governor, who frequently campaigns as an anti-politician while also attempting to master the Capitol's Byzantine ways, has recently resumed the outsider persona with a vengeance, deriding lawmakers individually and collectively, and threatening again to smash the political system. Rebuffed by both Democratic and some Republican legislators over his spending plan -- and losing face over his promises to deliver a budget on time -- the governor is taking aim at the state's governing institutions.
In Ontario on Saturday, with fast-food restaurants and a video game arcade as a backdrop, Schwarzenegger told hundreds of people attending a rally in a mall food court that they should vote Democratic lawmakers out of office if they stand in the way of passing a state budget.
After saying lawmakers should put the people's interests first through bipartisanship, Schwarzenegger said Democrats were holding up the budget by refusing to back down on issues important to trial lawyers and unions. He drew boisterous cheers from mall-goers when he said the lawmakers were "girlie men" too afraid to admit they favored "special interests" over the public interest.
"If these guys won't do the job, I'm going to announce each of you a terminator," Schwarzenegger said in reference to his widely known action film. "Nov. 2 is judgment day. That's when you go to the polls."
Schwarzenegger's appearance before hundreds of cheering shoppers at the Ontario Mills mall was part of his effort to pressure Democratic lawmakers. The governor and Democratic leaders agree they're stuck on three points -- local government financing and the repeal of two labor laws.
Today he is scheduled to appear in Stockton, the district of Democratic Assemblywoman Barbara Matthews.
One law prohibits schools from contracting services with private companies and the other gives workers authority to sue their employers to enforce labor laws. Democrats say they support the measures because they protect workers.
Though the governor didn't name particular legislators, he held the rally in the home city of Democratic Assemblywoman Gloria Negrete McLeod. He appeared Friday in the district of one of this year's few closely contested legislative districts, where Democratic Sen. Betty Karnette faces Republican Steve Kuykendall, a former legislator and congressman, for an open Assembly seat.
Schwarzenegger has had good results in his past direct appeals to public, including his push for workers' compensation changes and a $15 billion bond deal earlier this year.
Though the audience cheered throughout Schwarzenegger's speech Saturday, it was unclear whether audience members would put his calls to vote out Democrats into action.
Barbara Zinsmeyer, a 37-year-old homemaker from Redlands who is a registered Republican and voted for Schwarzenegger in October's recall election, said she would vote in November based on particular candidates, not their party. She is undecided, for example, in the presidential race.
Zinsmeyer believes state lawmakers may be delaying the budget because they resent Schwarzenegger's successes since taking office.
"Maybe there's pride involved," she said. "There might be jealousy."
Pete Johnson, a teacher from Walnut, said he strongly agreed with Schwarzenegger that trial lawyers and unions were having too much influence on the budget. He said he belonged to the teacher's union, but believed the governor, not the union, was responsible for getting him a raise this year.
"We got a raise this year because of Arnold, so tell those politicians to smoke it," he said.
Analysts say the change in tone by a governor with 65 percent approval ratings, could, if sustained, have extensive repercussions on the nation's most extensive political system outside of Washington, D.C.
"Californians have this really interesting proclivity to really like reforming government," says Mark Petracca, political science professor at the University of California at Irvine. "It really is hard to find an example with a reform placed on the ballot where the public has not supported it."
Schwarzenegger, who already has his California Performance Review plans to cut state bureaucracy in motion, said in Long Beach on Friday he plans to call a special election next year to make the Legislature part-time.
He's not bluffing, spokeswoman Ashley Snee said Saturday.
"I would say it's something he is seriously considering," she explained after Schwarzenegger's appearance in Ontario
The notion of a part-time Legislature coupled with term limits alarms many veteran political observers, including Barbara O'Connor, director of the Institute for the Study of Politics and the Media at California State University, Sacramento.
"They would be more dominated by big business and lobbyists and the infrastructure that surrounds the Capitol," she says. "I think that's not necessarily a good solution."
California's Field Poll director, Mark DiCamillo says he hasn't tested public opinion for a part-time Legislature, an issue Schwarzenegger first raised in April, but adds, "My instincts wouldn't be to dismiss it out of hand, that's for sure." His May 27 poll showed the Legislature with 27 percent approval ratings, less than half the 65 percent given the governor Californians elected last Oct. 7 in a historic recall election.
California is one of nine states where lawmaking is considered a full-time job. Voters in 1966 scrapped the state's part-time Legislature for a new "professional" institution that quickly became hailed as a model for other states and the nation's best lawmaking body. Other states with full-time legislatures include New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennyslvania and Wisconsin.
A June 10 Field Poll also showed 50 percent support for an open primary system that would let voters pick whomever they want in primary elections, regardless of parties, then send the top two choices to a November runoff. Though Schwarzenegger hasn't taken a position on the idea, many of his business supporters are behind it, believing it will bring more moderate voices to a Legislature widely viewed as dominated by right- or left-wing lawmakers.
Such partisan differences have become a key ingredient of Sacramento's annual budget standoff, producing late budgets from the Legislature every year since 1986.
"Best law-making body?" ROFL. That may have been true once but they hardly get ANY serious work done. Part-time sounds better. From my point of view, the less time the politicians spent micromanaging the details of our lives, the better off we'll all be.
I can name at least two new bureaucracies that he is creating. But hey let's not go on facts just feelings.
If he intends to carry though. Every one is still expecting a budget after the summer heat fades. They'll have one by Labor Day.
LOL - girlymen! (Love it)
This is stuff he campaigned on. You think he is not going to carry through? Come on. Wake up people. His fight to keep the state from taking county money is disingenuous while he pushes legislation through that will take more of the land they depend on for funding off the tax rolls. The bills he is pushing through were too socialist even for Davis.
I'm not in favor of this Louisiana style system. First of all, if it's moderates you're after, why do the Louisiana thing? They selected David Duke, and the crook Edwin Edwards. In this mass primary, if you've got say 4 Republicans and 2 Democrats, the 2 Dems may come in place #1 and #2, even if they don't get a combined 50% of the vote. If each Republican gets 15%, and each Democrat gets 20%, the two Dems are the top 2 contenders.
The Berkeley one is at http://www.ucop.edu/ile/
There are others.
Excellent candidates for closure.
Go for it Arnie..Clean Hause
If that happened, Gov Rino would lose his base.
Not only did GovRino hoodwink voters into approving a bond measure that sends California $15 billion more in debt, he now wants legislators to pass a budget that spends billions of dollars more then last years budget.
Fiscal conservatism means, either state spending gets reduced significantly, or taxes need to be raised. Working on the budgetary margins doesn't get the job done.
Voters are still not clear on what Arnold wants to do. His budget is $5 billion higher than the last one under Gray Davis even though there's still a huge deficit and its a deficit papered over with accounting gimmicks and massive borrowing. If he made a choice one way or the other, that would be a different story.
I hope McClintock jumps all over this effort for smaller government.
Well, like others have posted, time to get some popcorn and sit back and watch the fireworks! WOW! (I still love it, he called the legislators in California GIRLYMEN! It's just too funny!)
What are they?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.