I stand corrected! It is not scripture. The I Am is what threw me. Thanks for the adjustment. The point is, and it's nothing new that he is claiming himself a god and it is in my opinion that those that make strong claims in public eventually get judged before the final judgement.
-klimeckg
Then quit making strong claims in public. :-)
thems some mighty strong claims, hun, and this is a mighty public place. and maybe your god wants to do its own judging. get the rain forest out of your eye.
He isn't caliming to be God or anything else...this is a title put out by a slick back magazine...To confuse ego eime with cogito ergo sum suggests that you are more than a little unhinged....Perhaps you should just go get the tin foil hat and worry abot yourself.
Yes, I see where you are going with this.
Arrogance of man and all.
Good call.
Nahhhh.... You're confusing Steve Jobs and Larry Ellison, the founder of Oracle.
What's the difference between G-d and Larry Ellison?
G-d doesn't think that he's Larry Ellison!
Mark
Wow. First philosophy, and now calculus.
I hate it when something happens eventually, but before the end. To me, that's like one of those trick football players who goes half the distance to the goal on every play. You think he's doing well, but he never scores. Toward the end, he gains 1/128th of a yard, and then 1/256th of a yard, and then 1/512th of a yard... it gets boring. So I flip the channel to watch something else.
I'll come back a half-hour later and the guy will have just gained 1/65,536th of a yard. You can see the people in the stands leaving early.
I asked somebody about this once and they said you need calculus to figure it out. I'm told that if you can be certain that it will happen "eventually," but not at any particular time, and not at the end, then you can sorta forget about it, because it's like waiting for that football team to score. There... see that? They just gained 1/2147483648th of a yard. And that was a pass.
See, this is why they don't let Cal Tech into the Rose Bowl.
Have any of the Appleistas (Jobs or any of the corporate principals) ever said what the "apple with a bite out of it" logo is about? If it is an *intentional* mockery of a story in the Holy Bible, it doesn't matter if it's inaccurate - the Bible doesn't say it was an apple -, what matters is the intent. Mocking the Christian Book is not a profitable strategy. It could have something to do with why it is that Apple's OS and boxes, thought to be superior by some computer gerbs, has such a small part of the market. BTW is it true that the original iPod, that cost several hundreds of dollars, was essentially designed to be disposable? Jobs wanted you to buy a new one when the difficult-to-replace battery wore out?