Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
What should be offensive to this man is that two of his children are being murdered.

Maybe I read it wrong, but it sounded to me like he wanted all three babies, and tried to get his girlfriend to consider having all of them.

Once someone has agreed to the murder of his child, his presence at the slaughter is irrelevant.

What could he do about it? Honestly - what? It's not that I don't find flaw with him in some ways, but how could he stop her from doing this?

69 posted on 07/18/2004 12:56:41 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Peter asked: "Shouldn't we consider having triplets?"

He replied, ''What we're going to do.'' He respected what I was going through, but at a certain point, he felt that this was a decision we were making. I agreed.

He may have been reluctant at first but eventually he agreed (even if it was grudgingly).

When it is a matter of life and death, to sit idly by is an agreement. When someone does not do everything in one's power to halt a murder, their inaction is a act of consent. IMHO

81 posted on 07/18/2004 1:07:25 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet

Having been in a similar situation years ago I agree. He as the father has no say in the situation.


281 posted on 07/18/2004 6:50:26 PM PDT by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson