Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Chandler
He'll also know that if she were slightly less convenience-mad, she would have only "selectively eliminated" one, which would probably have been him.
61 posted on 07/18/2004 12:45:29 PM PDT by A.J.Armitage (http://calvinist-libertarians.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: A.J.Armitage

This is beyond the beyond. Her terminology. OMG. She refers to the non-twin as a "stand-alone." OMG. Sorry, this is just too much to handle, that anyone could be that cold-hearted and proud of it.


65 posted on 07/18/2004 12:50:44 PM PDT by I-53 (How public, like a frog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: WKB; dixiechick2000; onyx; wardaddy; Yudan
This article is just HORRIBLE.

I'm only surprised that the same thing didn't happen on an episode of Sex and the City.

After all, the characters on that show are equally as dedicated to their beloved Manhattan lifestyles as this woman is.

(The immoral mythological power of that show can scarcely be underestimated).

80 posted on 07/18/2004 1:06:52 PM PDT by bourbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: A.J.Armitage

So true--something tells me they were all boys too because I suspect if the twins were girls, she would have likely "reduced" the boy to keep her new little feminist recruits.


224 posted on 07/18/2004 4:06:08 PM PDT by cupcakes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson