Posted on 07/18/2004 11:04:36 AM PDT by Mulder
Take out a billboard in the rough area of town. Have it say simply...
"XXX at 123 Business Rd guarantees he doesn't have a gun on the premise. If robbed he has no means to defend himself other than 911."
LEt's see what his reaction will be. If he is outraged just ask him what the big deal is?
These yahoos are gonna mess it up for everyone else, and ability to carry unconcealed is gonna go by the wayside!
Hey Mulder, do you think any FReeper lawyers out there could tell us if by posting this sign the proprietor purports his establishment to be "safe" and if it proves not to be, would the prop be civilily liable?
Same in Alaska. Not many disagree with this rule.
Well, which is it?
Here is a question for Johnnie Edwards ... if a criminal enters such an establishment and starts shooting up the place, do the survivors and victim's family have a case against the restaurant for "disenfranchising" their right to defend themselves against just such an incident?
Oops, I see Navy Patriot already asked that question.
I don't think I've ever heard of any CCW holder getting liquored up while carrying. or if they did they obviously never used their weapon.
There are 36 or so states that now have "must issue" CCW permits. The lefties always screamed "blood in the streets" when these laws were passed, it never materialized. What makes you think that it will happen this time?
No "oops" about it, maybe we can "Edwards" these pantywaist proprietors. That'll target 'em where it hurts, the wallet.
I personally won't go hunting with people who think it is neat to get liqured up and go blasting away at anything that moves.
Same deal here.
Show me some stats. How many of these guys openly carrying are committing ANY kind of crime. I'm willing to bet it is much lower than those carrying illegally or not carrying at all.
Bah... these nervous nellies saying "BUT WE CAN'T LET PEOPLE DO THAT" piss me off.
Same here in Florida, and it's a stupid law, since it puts a prior restraint on folks. I don't drink, so why shouldn't I be able to carry in bars?
Law-abiding citizens don't always remain so when they are liquored-up.
All the more reason for the good guys to carry in places that serve alcohol.
These yahoos are gonna mess it up for everyone else, and ability to carry unconcealed is gonna go by the wayside!
So the state will infringe upon their Right to open carry if they actually exercise that Right? How Orwellian.
It varies from state. In Utah, they tried to pass a law this year that said any place that banned carry could be held civilly liable. I don't know if it passed or not.
In other states, I think you would have a very strong civil case. Based on them making a fraudulent claim, if nothing else.
Exactly.
The law in Virginia is particularly onerous since it bans concealed carry in ANY place that serves alcohol. So if you want to eat somewhere other than McDonalds, you have two choices: 1) go unarmed, or 2) carry openly.
I, like the Patriots in this article, would choose #2 also.
More anti-gun propaganda in Fairfax, VA.
The government has to stick its nose in everything. If a business owner wants to prevent guns on his property, he is entitled to do so. The government has no business either helping or hindering him to do so.
When my N/W company opened its first store in Dallas, the Personnel manager (recently transplanted from Seattle) posted a large sign at the employee entrance, "Carrying Guns At Work Is Prohibited!" I remember, in front of many employees, asking her,..."But, how will you ever know?"
I think these types of demonstrations will quickly result in new laws restricting open carry. People just aren't going to ever be comfortable around someone with a weapon out in the open.
My take is that society has this bass ackwards. It seems to me that it should be legal to carry anywhere as long as it is concealed. This avoids scaring the women and children and protects rights. Any criminal wanting to carry is going to conceal anyway, so making that illegal only hurts the law abiding.
LOL! Now that adds a very nice 'touch'!
"If a business owner wants to prevent guns on his property, he is entitled to
do so. The government has no business either helping or hindering him to do so."
Given the above, how do you propose the business owner do so?
What a coincidence ...I'm perceived as making those who are violent criminals ....prone with my 1911A1.
Stay safe !
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.