The Soros ThreatThe Capitalist Threat
(1997 article by Soros)SOROS SNACKING ON SIDE DISHES
(Soros the Adulterer)FR Search for Keyword George Soros
Posted on 07/17/2004 8:03:05 PM PDT by Richard Poe
Edited on 07/20/2004 7:53:41 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
FYI!
Richard's part II on $oreA$$ should be required reading for all conservatives.
The Soros ThreatThe Capitalist Threat
(1997 article by Soros)SOROS SNACKING ON SIDE DISHES
(Soros the Adulterer)FR Search for Keyword George Soros
Let Me Tell You A Lie.org
Excerpt:The truth be told, do you know what group has accepted politically motivated contributions from the biggest political contributor of them all? Do you know what group gets to accept soft money while it tries to influence our political system? MoveOn.org, that’s who. With George Soros contributing at least $2.5 million to MoveOn.org they have accepted over 1000 times what the cap is for a donation in a single contribution. Political propaganda groups like MoveOn.org and Americans Coming Together have accepted a total of at least $15.5 million from Soros making him the biggest political contributor of them all, corporations included. So, it should go without saying that the Democratic Party is the beneficiary of the biggest of the big contributors. But listening to MoveOn.org you would have no idea that this fact is the unarguable truth.
RP, I can never find your book at Borders.
You're welcome! You said the word 'index' and I thought of backhoe.
When I mention/think of Index, Backhoe is the first thought in my old mind.
I love this composite! You've got Soros right down to the 'grasping' hand.
The reply posted below is an example of the rapid response Digital Brownshirt Team working for George $orea$$, or Kerrorists for Kerry. We will probably find out that JimRob and the mods have banned this Brown Shirt Fifth Columnist several times.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1173603/posts?page=6#6
To: G.Mason
I see that this is a site with an intelligent conservative viewpoint. I hope you don't mind debating me, I'm neither Republican or Democrat-I choose from both parties, based on the abilities they bring to the office.
One thing you've said troubles me.
"Changed the tone and restored honor and dignity"?
No. There has been no effort to heal the deep divisions that threaten to tear our country apart.
The Bush administration attacks it's critics with little to no regard for the truth. (Kerry didn't try to "gut our intelligence" when he suggested we use it's surplus. Using the vote against funding for the war would have been more convincing as a vote against giving our troops body armor would have been more convincing had Bush not also done the same thing. He voted against a similiar plan that would have paid for itself through less upper class tax cuts)
More troubling has been the way the war against Iraq was sold to the world.
There was a strong humanitarian case to be made, as well as prosecuting an act of war (the assassination attempt). We had every reason to believe he might be hiding weapons.
There was no need to try to decieve the public, "honorable lies" be damned.
A CIA analysis indicated Saddam was likely to only use WMDs/give WMDs to Al Quada as a response to invasion and was censored, the opposite of what the administration claimed.
Ties between Saddam and 9/11 were hinted at, despite no evidece to support such a conclusion.
It made us look like we had something to hide, and gave Germany and France's leaders good press.
But worst of all, many Islamic moderates lost their credibility, as the fundamentalists were able to claim that it was proof that the Bush administration was leading a "crusade". (remember that to many, a crusade is a synonym for a Jihad.)
As a result of that,(and a poorly planned foreign policy attacked by such far left liberals as Sen Lugar, George Bush sr, and George Will) we lost much of the support we had after 9/11.
Only those who have a vested interest in reelecting the president have counted that as a triumph.
I hope you understand, for the rest of us, that's not good enough.
6 posted on 07/18/2004 8:03:50 AM PDT by Eye of the storm
Check the rapid response time elapsed from when Yoe posted the summary of the Good Record of JW to the when the rapid response Brown Shirt made its reply.
Thank you. :^D
Bullseye !!
There is a current example of a Rapid Response Digital Lunatic Lefty Brownshirt on a thread right now.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1173603/posts?page=6#6
Try the same places I've found Barbara Olson's books about the Clintons when they were new releases.....history, social science. No kidding!
I ordered 'Hillary's Secret War' online. Saves a lot of huffing and puffing at the book store employees.
It'll be more like 51-48. I never heard of Kangas, until I read Poe. Most Americans don't read Poe. And considering the non-stop hoaxes that the media and the DNC have colluded on on behalf of Kerry, a 51-48 showing for Bush will be a perfectly respectable one.
You're welcome!
Actually, you deserve the thanks because your composites convey a big message in a glance!
I sic'd the Kitties on him !!
He won't last long. He made that ONE post and hasn't replied to comments to him yet.Southack is taking him to the woodshed, I think.
5 ..... 4 ..... 3 ..... 2 ..........
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
