Regards, Ivan
Posted on 07/17/2004 4:11:41 PM PDT by MadIvan
Regards, Ivan
Ping!
The poor dear...
This week? I stopped reading him after his tirade against the Catholic church after the abuse scandal and his long diatribe about how celibacy is unnatural therefore, essentially, pushing priests into abusing young teens (no chance, of course, that there were actually homosexuals, right Andrew?).
Wrong, Andy. Despite your most sincere wishes the good majority of the country is against homo marriage, and Bush's strong and consistent stance against it will only help him.
Blinded by his rage. Surely he knows that evangelicals are not the only ones opposed to homosexual "marriage." A large chunk of the non-evangelical black vote and women's vote are opposed as well. In fact, many black churches have been making a stink about this. And yet, all Sullivan can do is bash Bible believers.
Best to you,
Exactly.
Image from http://www.allahpundit.com/archives/000336.html
The homosexuals are all upset when they realized this weeks FMA vote was not the final word. CNN and a few suspect FNC reporters initial spin was that FMA was dead and gone.
Not so.
Sulivan the homosexual must be upset that there will be no federal recognition of homosexual recreational sex based marriages. Just another intollerant homosexual.
Homosexuals, like sulivan, MUST declare all opposition to all things homsexual as based only on religion. A lie of course. A hitlerina big lie to confuse the issue.
There are ample secular reasons to oppose homosexual sex marriage and homosexuality in general. However that does not play well for the perverts.
It is no different they resurecting the fictional homosexual gene every time homosexuals loose. Perhaps homosexuality should be treated with a 12 step program like other destructive addictions and behaviors.
That being said, I do agree that a constitutional amendment is grandstanding at this point. There are not enough votes to pass it and the Republicans know it. Far more effective it would be to (a)bitchslap the activist judges by reorganizing or abolishing their judgeships- perfectly legal with a simple majority. Or (b)withhold any public funds and resources to enforce their ruling. Just one, I would like to see activist judges put in their place. It takes no more votes to impeach them than to pass a constitutional ammendment . . . and it is a lot faster.
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
President Bush isn't losing gay voters - because gay voters are not 'swing' voters. (Unless you are talking about the swing of a delicately manufactured, perfectly hand beaded, Gaultier handbag!). Gay voters, vote by and large vote with an agenda. And that agenda is NOT Republican.
I live half a world away from America and *I* can see that. How in the hell does Andrew Sullivan NOT see it?
Flog'ers? Or Flogs'his? Ha! Ha! *L*
bitter yes. Sullivan needs fatter clumsier profiles under the sun than the ones conservatives are giving him lately. all he's seeing is shadow warriors and he hates what that means.
A recent Pew Forum poll found that the undecideds form about 21% of the electorate at this point in the campaign, compared with 32% at this stage in 2000.Duh. This means that GWB has more of the undecides up front, and Kerry has only his embittered Bush-haters. Haven't they heard? Hatred is not a family value... ;')
Response: Closer ever closer. The analogy being Rome in the time between the death of the Gracchi and the rise of Marius and Sulla; compared to the time between the death of the Kennedy's and ?????
"Andrew...a touch bitter..."
Could it be that he takes affront at this because he is homosexual?
vaudine
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.