[tpaine]

What current "conservative" policies "regulate the behavior of others"?
No idea what on earth you could be
thinking of.
28 HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity

______________________________________

Absurd claim you make. You have "no idea" that ALL levels of our governments, -- fed/state/local, -- are making ever increasing numbers of 'laws' to regulate the behavior of others?

Virtually every other post on FR is made about some new outrageous 'law' imposed upon us by the RinoCratic regime that infests DC, and every Statehouse in the USA.

Pretending that the GOP is blameless in our slide into socialism is ludicrous.
34 tpaine

______________________________________


-- no one is being "regulated" by conservatives or conservative policies on this matter. The pseudo "libertarian" spin on this is rather lame.

Tom Paine was an extremist wacko, by the way. Totalitarian secular humanism is not part of the conservative tradition. Nor is it mandated by the U.S. Constitution. Paine's Jacobinism died a deserving death in the gallows of 18th-century France. No serious man romanticizes that or venerates its memory.
38 Howling-Absurdities

______________________________________


Whatever.
Get back to me when you want to address the issue.

Your claim that there are no
'-- conservative policies that regulate the behavior of others --' is a howler.

The renewal of the AWB is just one such 'conservative policy' supported by the current administration. You have 'any ideas' about it?

[HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity]

Your claim that there are no '-- conservative policies that regulate the behavior of others --' is a howler.

Where did you get that? Are you on drugs now? As noted above (more than once), the issue I addressed was condoms and abstinence as commented on in the article. Conservative policies Do NOT control or regulate people from copulating or buying condoms.

IS THAT CLEAR? CAN YOU READ? CONDOMS SEX ABSTINENCE ZANY UN DEPOPULATION SCHEMES

[HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity]

I don't see any burden upon the U.S. taxpayers to help the United Nations supply condoms to people in Tasmania or Luxembourg. Someone suggesting not to fund such things is not "regulating" anyone on the matter of their "privacy of the bedroom."