Replies

Stewart was arrogant and gigantically stuuuuupid to speak with the FBI without a lawyer. The news reported that the FBI warned her not to talk to them because a lie would be prosecuted.

I agree that was stupid.

The thing that freaks me out is that I am a software developer and sometimes really believe I remember what caused a problem in the code, something I would swear to, and then find out it was something different. In other words, I sometimes do not remember everything exactly as it happened.

To get me for lying would probably be easy for them, as they would just have to interview me twice. The first time would be what I thought it was, the second would be what it actually was after I investigated and found out what it was.

My question with regard to Martha would be is that what she remembered at the time and then was corrected once the facts were investigated or did she lie? I did not follow the case real close but the jury obviously thought she was lying.

but you are not raising your right hand.
you are not talking to the FBI.

The two inteviews would never happen if you had a lawyer. Even if they did, you would be briefed by the lawyer how to answer. (ie. I would have to read the exact code line, or I don't remember unless I see the code in front of me.) In essence assume nothing, not even the time of day.

Rumsfeld is excellent at answering questions.

Stewart was doing he, "I am the great and mighty OZ!!!" impression. She was exposed as a fool behind the curtain.

She fiddled with her own phone records,then after talking with her then szon-in-law the lawyer,harshly ordered her assistant to put it back,the way it was.That's NOT doing something and then forgetting about it!