The more we analyze the timeline, the more I wonder, too...because the Wilson story (whether coming directly from him or from supporters such as Jacoby in this instance) keeps misrepresenting the timeline, as your example shows.
In fact the committee asked Wilson why he made statements about the forged documents when he couldn't have had access to them--an indication they noticed his mixing up of the timeline, though he claimed being confused. Note that Tenet makes a point in his July statement of saying Wilson never mentioned any documents of any sort at the time he gave his oral report, and it is one thing that made me think Tenet was suspicious of Wilson and spouse.
Why would Jacoby say this here unless instructed by Wilson? Either she was told by Wilson that was the sequence and she failed to research it, or she is a willing participant in the misrepresentation.
It continues to indicate the likelyhood the British Dossier question and the 16 words question were coordinated (as we've often stated is our suspicion) attacks on Blair and Bush, and the Wilson faction's habit of using the forged documents to advance their ruse only raises the question if they had any hand in their creation.
BTW, Jacoby leaps from the (January) SOTU speech to Wilson's July op-ed with nary a reference to Wilson's February column in the Nation or appearances on PBS where he failed to raise any concerns with the president's representations. And since he does in fact refer to the speech, we know he saw it or read it. I guess the plan wasn't ripe yet...
Jacoby is just a paid liar doing what she can with what she's dealt.
I assumed Joe's comments about the forgeries was just repeating what the UN's IAEA said about them after the SOTU speech. But reading the report, I've come to the conclusion they might not be forgeries. The Coommitte reserves comment because of an ongoing "FBI disinformation investigation". Is the disinfo the documents...or that they were forged?
If the latter, is the IAEA in on it? Who helped them figure out that the "dates" and names of Nigerien officials did not match? Who knows a lot about Niger? IAEA claims they did a google search - is stuff on the web accurate?
You all should really read the Senate's report...