Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whoopi Goldberg latest star punished over anti-Bush remarks (Barf Alert)
Mercury News ^ | 7/16/04 | Anthony Breznican - AP

Posted on 07/16/2004 9:04:31 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

LOS ANGELES - Some may think Whoopi Goldberg's crack about President Bush was no big whoop. But in the latest case of celebrity censure over political remarks, Slim-Fast cut Goldberg out like carbs.

The diet giant dropped the comedy queen from its advertising campaign because the company's executives were unhappy with anti-Bush remarks Goldberg made at a recent political rally.

"While I can appreciate what the Slim-Fast people need to do in order to protect their business, I must also do what I need to do as an artist, as a writer and as an American - not to mention as a comic," Goldberg said in a statement Thursday. "It's unfortunate that, in this country, the two cannot mesh."

Goldberg declined to be interviewed for this story.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: antibush; crackho; goldberg; lateststar; punished; remarks; slimfast; whoopi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: sinanju

Extremely well stated, well thought out and meaningful.


61 posted on 07/16/2004 10:48:33 AM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MACVSOG68


Freedom of expression is OK if you're spewing hate. Not agreeing with those saying it is punishment, not freedom of expression. Got it.

Boy these liberal rules are so hard to follow.


62 posted on 07/16/2004 10:53:56 AM PDT by IamConservative (A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Hey, the media still tries to refer to MoveOn.org as a "grass roots" organization.

They're probably right about the "grass" part, because those guys are definitely smoking something.
63 posted on 07/16/2004 10:58:37 AM PDT by JayNorth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: IamConservative

Yeah, I think you do get it. Now if only the rest of voting America will get it!


64 posted on 07/16/2004 11:11:05 AM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The headline is correct. The explanation is what needs correction. Goldberg was fired by her employer who reacted to public displeasure with her statements. The decision was based on economics not politics. Although Goldberg's politics were the reason why the decision had to be made. Why is this situation any different than Anita Bryant being fired as spokesperson for Florida orange juice after her negative comments about homosexuals? I can see no difference.


65 posted on 07/16/2004 11:17:49 AM PDT by Poodlebrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju
In all of history, there has been but one minstral so truly clever, that his counsel was deservedly sought. Goeffrey Chaucer is still an exceptional entertainer.

Because of his success; Today, every cat juggler, and plate spinner presumes that his station is of some status.

The inescapable reality is they are unlikely to be as useful as a dishwasher. I'm sure the Lords of the Dark Ages held the same standard.

Bluster is there only tool. As you have eloquently pointed out, it is hysterical to watch them self-destruct reclaiming "I really am important!!".

66 posted on 07/16/2004 11:34:52 AM PDT by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

I try not to listen to entertainer's political opinions as much as possible so I will still be able to enjoy their work. For me, unfortunately, there is a threshold at which I can no longer enjoy an entertainer if I become too aware of their anti-American utterances.


67 posted on 07/16/2004 11:52:39 AM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man; TheDon; laotzu; Poodlebrain; MACVSOG68; JayNorth; IamConservative; sandbar; ...

"Throughout its history, Hollywood has always been somewhat out of control and most entertainers have always been overtly engrossed with themselves. In the old days, however, Hollywood projected a certain class and set a positive tone that folks could respect. Something sorely missing from todays screen stars, made up mostly of juvenile big mouths and propagandist leftest thugs. Today most of filmdoms elites are full of s**t and think the world revolves around them. To a certain degree thats true. It's the pop culture we live in today. A pop culture that drives the good, the bad and the ugly in American society.

Yup. In old-time Tinseltown vice at least paid respect to virtue and the studio bosses tried to keep outrageous behavior under wraps. The system did enforce some limits, the communists were officially kept at arms length [see: Reagan, Ronald, W., president, Screen Actors Guild] and during the wars they were unabashedly patriotic [ol' Schickelgruber had his admirers in babylon but after 12/07/41 they instantly found another song to sing]. It is one thing to question authority, to rebel without a cause, to pluck the grapes of wrath, or rub one's golden arm but the roaring sixties didn't just change the culture but rather, reversed it.

Now, by way of example, we have a convicted child molester, the director Victor Salva [Powder, Jeepers Creepers] being lauded openly...

"Perhaps Hollywood's most unsung auteur, Victor Salva's career has been one of moderate commercial success flooded with controversy. To some, he's a competent B-filmmaker with an eye for precision. To others, he's a brilliant thinking-man's Spielberg with an eye for jaded lead characters and some fantastic directorial flourishes. Nevertheless, Salva has brought an almost Hemingway-like approach to his films, films that recall the visual display of Spielberg with characters that recall the rough masculinity of classic Howard Hawks. On the surface, Salva's films seem so deceptively simple, with what seem like basic plots and characters. But beneath the surface lies dark examinations on fear, repression, anguish, and misery."

While Mr. Salva has no difficulty finding people to work with him and defend him in public, anyone who cannot recite the leftist catechism chapter-and-verse might as well be toiling in Inquisition-era Spain or Stalin's Russia. Unless one is as big as Mel Gibson or Tom Hanks one had better carefully watch what one says and does. Not my definition of freewheeling; just the switch of one dogma for another

I was seventeen when MTV debuted and eagerly watched it evolve. In a bit over a decade or so I have watched it mutate into something truly hideous to behold. Every now and then they would come up with something interesting, heck, once upon a time they even played music videos! But now, now it's hootchies, bling-bling, the endless spring break, the Osbournes, and a Real World / Road Rules lineup that once had "real" genuinely interesting people in it but has long since filled itself with pretty, empty-headed, unbelievably boring kids self-consciously behaving badly for the camera. I wondered if it was just me geezing but I recall reading of the original VJ's being interviewed on the occasion of MTV's twentieth anniversary admitting that they don't let their own kids watch it.

This is why I hold out some hope in the technological revolution that has enabled a proliferation of choices good as well as bad. Now, maybe the new spirit of enforcement in the federal broadcasting establishment will begin to bite and hopefully the industry will get back to basics, but the expansion of alternatives to the same old swill will force change one way or another. In addition to satellite, internet and (hopefully) expanding bandwidth the success of Mel's Passion made and distributed entirely outside the old system is the harbinger of things to come. Now that movies can be made and edited (and soon distributed, no doubt) entirely digitally the playing field must even out over time. I for one, eagerly await the revolution.

68 posted on 07/16/2004 11:59:31 AM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
FReedom of speech DOES NOT mean you also have FReedom FRom repercussions of flapping one's gums just becuz one can.

Absolutely. Slim Fast is simply exercising their FReedom, to have whoever they want, advertise their products. These left wing liberal socialist pinko commie demon rats may not like it, but they can go pee up a rope. It is called FReedom. I can't believe I used to be a demon rat.

69 posted on 07/16/2004 12:08:29 PM PDT by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

Well-written and hopeful, sinanju. Welcome to Free Republic.


70 posted on 07/16/2004 12:24:01 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: weegee

just heard they are suing fox.


71 posted on 07/16/2004 2:39:25 PM PDT by longfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound


" . . . not to mention as a comic..".

If that was comedy, then Howard Stern is the Three Stooges. A Carol Burnette she's not!
I was thinking she was more like the Marx bros. Harpo, Chico, Groucho, and Assuglyho !


72 posted on 07/16/2004 2:44:24 PM PDT by longfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Funny how I didn't hear Whoopi complaining about her free speech rights being violated in that nobody in the media has actually written direct quotes of her jokes. You'd think she'd be up in arms that her art wasn't described in all its glory!


73 posted on 07/16/2004 2:46:20 PM PDT by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

She understood why Slim-Fast canned her. As for declining to be interviewed, its a good thing cause I am sure as heck tired of people who whine when life deals them a bad hand.


74 posted on 07/16/2004 2:48:52 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

does anyone know exactly what whoopi goldberg said? if it's too rude, can anyone direct me to a link where i can find a direct quote?

thanks!


75 posted on 07/22/2004 1:04:51 AM PDT by berettaman (what did she say?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson