Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen; Cloud William
I suppose we could close our eyes to the fact that the vast majority of the federal courts have ruled that way ....

I say we leave the USSC out of this and strengthen state constitutions.

What made you change your mind?

And third, I sure do wish that Justice Thomas would spend less time convincing the public of his position and more time convincing his fellow Justices TO ACCEPT A RKBA CASE.

310 posted on 07/18/2004 5:40:54 PM CDT by robertpaulsen

Post 310

265 posted on 07/20/2004 3:15:26 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies ]


To: Ken H
Is this your life's calling -- playing "gotcha"?

Two different areas, buttinski. 1) Should Clarence Thomas a) publicly discuss ad nauseum his conservative position on everything from abortion to gun rights? or b) be spending that time pushing his fellow members to take on a RKBA case? Corrct answer: B

2) Should the citizens of a state like California be pushing for a) the USSC to hear a god-awful case like Silveira v Lockyer? or b) their state legislature to amend the state constitution to protect their RKBA? Correct answer: B

266 posted on 07/20/2004 5:48:30 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson