[mcshot]

That same or a similar "documentary" offered the "impossible zoom climb" scenario to cover the streaking ascending object that many witnessed. Something is wrong here and I hope the truth comes out. I remember that James(?) Kalstrom from the FBI retired shortly after this incident. I remember where he was quoted (off the record) responding positively to a question about a missile striking the plane. To think they think we are all this dumb is numbing.

mc

[alice_in_bubbaland]

I will never accept the NTSB's findings. I remember watching TV that night and there were too many eye witnesses describing a streaking object acending towards the plane. The following morning's newscasts said nothing about this.

[sine_nomine]

When Kahlstrom first faced the media, he mentioned that terrorism was possible. Later, when he did the center fuel tank commedy routine, his expression said that he did not believe a word of it.

This is my theory. They all knew what did it - a terrorist missile or maybe a bomb. They thought it would wreck tourism and air travel to admit the truth. I think the same scenario was true when the jet crashed in NY after 9/11. Soon after the mad shoe bomber was caught trying, and we have been scanning shoes ever since.

Clinton liked disasters. They helped him in the eyes of the public. Oklahoma City was good for him, even rescued his sorry behind. I am inclined to believe the Clintons were way too close to the source of these events, as shown by their relationship to Chinese spycraft.