Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Critter

"The Navy (proven to have been in the area that night) did not sail to the scene. "

The same Navy that initially denied being in the area.


146 posted on 07/16/2004 7:26:49 PM PDT by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]


To: Tymesup
That's the part that proves to me that there is some major cover-up. I always thought though, that the truth would come out sometime after the upcoming election. I didn't think the Clinton administration could squash the truth so thoroughly.

My guess is that the Navy took out 800. It's the only logical explanation for their behavior (not sailing to the scene)and the fact that the truth hasn't been allowed to see the light of day. I think the cover-up was ordered by the white-house, and that anyone with knowledge has been threatened with imprisonment or worse.

If it were a terrorist act, it would have been politically expedient to let the truth come out eventually, even if it had to be done by the subsequent Bush administration.
151 posted on 07/16/2004 8:14:50 PM PDT by Critter (...an online gathering place for sissy boy, girlie men, nanny staters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson