Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Modern Imperialism, U.S. Needs to Walk Softly
LA Times ^ | July 15, 2004 | Max Boot

Posted on 07/15/2004 10:30:32 PM PDT by neverdem

COMMENTARY

With the Coalition Provisional Authority disbanded and L. Paul Bremer III back at home, it's time to ponder the future of American imperialism. Many, of course, will huffily reply that U.S. imperialism has no future, and they will point to all the troubles we've encountered in Iraq during the last year as evidence.

But whatever happens in Iraq, there will continue to be strong demand for U.S. interventions around the world. Failed states and rogue states constitute the biggest threats to world peace in the foreseeable future, and only the United States has the will and the resources to do anything about them. Even many of those who detested the invasion of Iraq plead for the U.S. to bring order to places like Darfur, a province in Sudan where genocide is occurring. The U.S. cannot shrug off the burden of global leadership, at least not without catastrophic cost to the entire world, but it can exercise its power more wisely than it did in Iraq over the past year.

One of Bremer's chief failings was that he tried to act the part of an imperial proconsul. He and his spokesmen hogged the media spotlight, which only exacerbated Iraqis' tendency to blame them for everything that went wrong, from too many car bombings to not enough electricity. It was almost as if Bremer were Lord Curzon, the notoriously vain viceroy of India from 1898 to 1905, who delighted in pomp and circumstance, such as the grandiose festival he staged in 1903 to mark Edward VII's coronation as king of Britain and emperor of India. For obvious reasons — the rise of nationalism, the fall of traditional European empires — that approach doesn't work well today. No one is going to crown George II emperor of Mesopotamia.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; geopolitics; imperialism; iraq; maxboot

1 posted on 07/15/2004 10:30:32 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Oh yeah, and don't forget the BIG STICK...


2 posted on 07/15/2004 10:36:42 PM PDT by dandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The screed is lighter than light. The unsubstantiated claim is that if only Bremer had denied press interviews, it would all be better, and the US could be the man behind the curtain in Iraq for 70 years without breaking a sweat. Boot perhaps does not understand that maybe things have changed a bit on the ground since Britain pulled the strings in Egypt.


3 posted on 07/15/2004 10:36:43 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Yeah. If only we were as smart as this author we'd learn that when we've finished kicking the snot out of a murdering tyrant we ought to be humble and turn over the governance of that country to the people we've freed of his noxious oppression. Gosh, if we were only that smart, Afghanistan and Iraq would be in the hands of their own citizens by now...

Oh, they are? Well, whaddya know?

4 posted on 07/15/2004 10:46:49 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson